-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
[Process] Added support for stdout and stderr flush (Issue #7884) #8288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7e5fbdf
[Process] Added support for stdout and stderr flush (Issue #7884)
9f5aef9
[Process] New tests for flush methods
321cbc1
[Process] [Tests] Fixing faulty tests for stdout and stderr flush met…
20e67f3
[Process] Removed unnecesary flush + get methods keeping flush only
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fabpot shouldn't a flush method send all the buffers content and clear the buffer afterwards, intead of only clearing it? (This is what php does when flushing a buffer, isn't it?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
send
? We don't send the buffers anyway. It's up to you to get the buffer and do whatever you want with them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me say it in another way. I would not expect that a method called flushxxx() just clears the buffer. If so, this method should be named e.g. CleanBuffer() (to be consitent with php naming)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this context, I don't what it can do on top of removing the data from the buffer. See http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/F/flush.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Taken from your link
Thats what I meant.. It is not delete. Flush is more like a stop now but process everything which is already there.
Since this is not the case here, flush is not the correct term in this situation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I read the whole thing ;) Actually, I could link to definition 1, which is exactly what we do here, but I won't. I do understand what you mean, except that it does not apply here as the Process class never output/send the buffers, so there are no ambiguities here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that, given functionality of
ob_flush()
, which sends and cleans the buffer, the methods should be named differently. See #9407.