[Routing] Document the Requirement constants in routing.rst #16926
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gnito-org
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2022
xabbuh
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2022
|
Nic, thanks for your contribution and for the perfect explanation (which even includes a screenshot of the resulting rendering 😍). While merging we did a minor tweak to add the Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #16718
symfony/symfony#45528 by @fancyweb introduced the
Symfony\Component\Routing\Requirement\Requirementenum in Symfony 6.1, as a solution for symfony/symfony#26524.It was blogged about in https://symfony.com/blog/new-in-symfony-6-1-improved-routing-requirements-and-utf-8-parameters, but I couldn't find it anywhere in the Routing documentation.
This PR adds a small hint about the use of the
Requirementenum for common route requirements:I'm open for suggestions to further improve this. I decided to use a small info block instead without code examples, because it doesn't seem to be a big feature and I'm not sure how well it is supported across all configuration formats. Let me know if you would like to see some code examples.