Skip to content

[Validation] Add "hasser" support #3418

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2014
Merged

[Validation] Add "hasser" support #3418

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
bfe3a20
[Validation] Add "hasser" support
bicpi Jan 4, 2014
bb9004e
Add "versionadded" directive for 2.5
bicpi Jan 4, 2014
b9f8b8d
fix "versionadded" wording
bicpi Jan 5, 2014
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 8 additions & 5 deletions book/validation.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -583,8 +583,11 @@ Getters

Constraints can also be applied to the return value of a method. Symfony2
allows you to add a constraint to any public method whose name starts with
"get" or "is". In this guide, both of these types of methods are referred
to as "getters".
"get", "is" or "has". In this guide, these types of methods are referred to
as "getters".
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need a versionadded directive for the "hasser" support

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added this yesterday, see commit below.


.. versionadded:: 2.5
Support for methods starting with ``has`` was introduced in Symfony 2.5.

The benefit of this technique is that it allows you to validate your object
dynamically. For example, suppose you want to make sure that a password field
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -665,9 +668,9 @@ Now, create the ``isPasswordLegal()`` method, and include the logic you need::
.. note::

The keen-eyed among you will have noticed that the prefix of the getter
("get" or "is") is omitted in the mapping. This allows you to move the
constraint to a property with the same name later (or vice versa) without
changing your validation logic.
("get", "is" or "has") is omitted in the mapping. This allows you to move
the constraint to a property with the same name later (or vice versa)
without changing your validation logic.

.. _validation-class-target:

Expand Down