Skip to content

Conversation

weaverryan
Copy link
Member

Hiya guys!

This comes after #3596.

I realized that the sentence on the notes was a bid hard to read. I also removed a usage of
the word "client" right before this, so I can use the word "cache" instead (meaning, I want
the user to be thinking about the reverse proxy, not a user's browser cache - that's valid,
but not the typical use-case).

Q A
Doc fix? yes
New docs? no
Applies to all
Fixed tickets -

Thanks!

I realized that the sentence on the notes was a bid hard to read. I also removed a usage of
the word "client" right before this, so I can use the word "cache" instead (meaning, I want
the user to be thinking about the reverse proxy, not a user's browser cache - that's valid,
but not the typical use-case).
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2014
This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch.

Discussion
----------

Http cache validation rewording

Hiya guys!

This comes after #3596.

I realized that the sentence on the notes was a bid hard to read. I also removed a usage of
the word "client" right before this, so I can use the word "cache" instead (meaning, I want
the user to be thinking about the reverse proxy, not a user's browser cache - that's valid,
but not the typical use-case).

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Doc fix?      | yes
| New docs?     | no
| Applies to    | all
| Fixed tickets | -

Thanks!

Commits
-------

a7cdfe9 [#3596] Tweaking language on HTTP cache
@weaverryan weaverryan merged commit a7cdfe9 into 2.3 Mar 19, 2014
@weaverryan weaverryan deleted the http-cache-reword branch March 19, 2014 02:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant