Feedback: needs more documentation #10413
Replies: 1 comment
-
As clearly mentioned in our discussion guidelines
As you are not in the maintainer team, nor are you asking a question of the broader community - using a discussion is incorrect. Your feedback is valuable - but we need it via the correct channel. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Body
Just some feedback. The documentation needs to be clearer.
Please consider this eslint config:
It reports this error:
I have no way of knowing how to actually do this. The documentation doesn't go beyond the simplest possible scenario, and fails to consider basically anything else.
I can't just do
turbo as ConfigWithExtends
or whatever, because ESLint requires the config to be a javascript file. So in fact there's literally nothing I can add to make typescript understand what it's importing.And also, I'm not the author of
eslint-config-turbo
so I can't just add typings to it. But moreover, you can't expect every author of every eslint config package to provide their typings.Afaict, this is placing me between a rock and a hard place. Please update the documentation with more scenarios like this one.
Additional Info
Sorry about my last topic. I didn't know I wasn't allowed to ask about a problem - I consider that feedback. Kinda rude to close it without allowing me to explain myself, so I just created a new discussion, more clearly formulating it as feedback. Please do not close and lock 🙏🏻
Before you submit your discussion, please confirm the following. If any of these required steps are not taken, we may not be able to review your RFC. Help us to help you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions