Enhancement: [consistent-type-assertion] Bring in options from total-functions/no-unsafe-type-assertion #6011
JoshuaKGoldberg
announced in
RFCs
Replies: 1 comment
-
TBH I really hate One big problem is that you can do I think we need to take a look at this rule and really evaluate the point of it and what we might do better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Before You File a Proposal Please Confirm You Have Done The Following...
My proposal is suitable for this project
Link to the rule's documentation
https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/consistent-type-assertions
Description
https://github.com/danielnixon/eslint-plugin-total-functions#total-functionsno-unsafe-type-assertion has some useful options:
Can we add these options to
@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions
?Fail
Pass
Additional Info
Forking conversation out from danielnixon/eslint-plugin-total-functions#665.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions