Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [member-ordering] ignore method overloading #10536

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor

@yeonjuan yeonjuan commented Dec 21, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

Change this rule to ignore overloading method definitions that do not have an implementation. #2409 (comment)

class Foo {
    myMethod(a: string); // skip
    myMethod(a: number); // skip
    myMethod(a: number, b: string); // skip
    myMethod(a: string | number, b?: string) { // check
        alert(a.toString());
    }
}

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @yeonjuan!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit bc569e4
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6767c7f1b2610d000868a06d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10536--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (🟢 up 21 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 21, 2024

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit bc569e4.

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --... ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run-many --target=clean ✅ Succeeded 11s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2024-12-22 15:35:50 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.84%. Comparing base (b2ce158) to head (bc569e4).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10536      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.78%   86.84%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         445      445              
  Lines       15366    15427      +61     
  Branches     4475     4499      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits        13336    13397      +61     
  Misses       1675     1675              
  Partials      355      355              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 86.84% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ackages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/member-ordering.ts 96.66% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

@@ -4471,7 +4517,7 @@ class Foo {
abstract class Foo {
abstract B: string;
abstract A(): void;
public C(): {};
public C() {}
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yeonjuan yeonjuan Dec 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is probably a typo. The following TS error occurs because {} is a return type
Function implementation is missing or not immediately following the declaration.

@yeonjuan yeonjuan marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2024 15:35
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 👏

Now we only have one issue about member-ordering left... very pleased. 😄

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 9746832 into typescript-eslint:main Dec 30, 2024
65 checks passed
renovate bot added a commit to mmkal/eslint-plugin-mmkal that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
##### [v8.19.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8190-2024-12-30)

##### 🚀 Features

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[strict-boolean-expressions] check array predicate functions' return statements ([#10106](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10106))

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[member-ordering] ignore method overloading ([#10536](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10536))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] don't report on indirect circular references ([#10537](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10537))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[array-type] autofix with conditional types needs parentheses ([#10522](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10522))
-   **eslint-plugin:** add getConstraintInfo to handle generic constraints better ([#10496](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10496))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Karl Werner
-   Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
OlivierZal pushed a commit to OlivierZal/typescript-eslint that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
…script-eslint#10536)

* fix(eslint-plugin): [member-ordering] ignore method overloading

* refactor
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.18.2 | 8.19.0 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.18.2 | 8.19.0 |


## [v8.19.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8190-2024-12-30)

##### 🚀 Features

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[strict-boolean-expressions] check array predicate functions' return statements ([#10106](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10106))

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[member-ordering] ignore method overloading ([#10536](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10536))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] don't report on indirect circular references ([#10537](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10537))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[array-type] autofix with conditional types needs parentheses ([#10522](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10522))
-   **eslint-plugin:** add getConstraintInfo to handle generic constraints better ([#10496](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10496))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Karl Werner
-   Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[member-ordering] decorated method overloads have unexpected behavior
2 participants