Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the declare keyword #10543

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

ronami
Copy link
Member

@ronami ronami commented Dec 23, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

This PR addresses #10539 and adjusts the rule to include the following ways of defining functions (and their parameters) behind the ignoreFunctionTypeParameterNameValueShadow flag:

const arg1 = 0;
declare function test1(arg1: string): typeof arg1;

const arg2 = 0;
declare class Test3 {
  p2(arg2: string): typeof arg2;
}

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @ronami!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@ronami ronami changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] don't report on parameters of function declaration or function/method overloads fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] don't report on parameters of function declaration or function/method overload declarations Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 23, 2024

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a11528b.

Command Status Duration Result
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 7m 17s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin ✅ Succeeded 5m 56s View ↗
nx test type-utils --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 25s View ↗
nx test visitor-keys --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx test utils --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 6s View ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 1m 12s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --... ✅ Succeeded 1m 15s View ↗
Additional runs (24) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2024-12-30 17:20:15 UTC

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a11528b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6772d1da78251f0008cb1ad4
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10543--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (🟢 up 26 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.90%. Comparing base (5a39e0c) to head (a11528b).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10543      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.84%   86.90%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         445      446       +1     
  Lines       15427    15497      +70     
  Branches     4497     4514      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits        13397    13467      +70     
  Misses       1675     1675              
  Partials      355      355              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 86.90% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-shadow.ts 80.45% <ø> (ø)

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

@ronami ronami changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] don't report on parameters of function declaration or function/method overload declarations fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] don't report on parameters of type-only function declarations Dec 23, 2024
@ronami ronami marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2024 20:24
@ronami ronami changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] don't report on parameters of type-only function declarations fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the declare keyword Dec 24, 2024
kirkwaiblinger
kirkwaiblinger previously approved these changes Dec 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! 🎉🎄

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Dec 25, 2024
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ const allowedFunctionVariableDefTypes = new Set([
AST_NODE_TYPES.TSCallSignatureDeclaration,
AST_NODE_TYPES.TSFunctionType,
AST_NODE_TYPES.TSMethodSignature,
AST_NODE_TYPES.TSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression,
AST_NODE_TYPES.TSDeclareFunction,
Copy link
Contributor

@yeonjuan yeonjuan Dec 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @ronami IMO, TSConstructSignatureDeclaration and TSConstructorType should also be added, what do you think?

// "ignoreFunctionTypeParameterNameValueShadow": true
const arg = 0;

declare const Foo: {
  foo: (arg: number) => void;
  new(arg: number): void; // 'arg' is already declared in the upper scope on line 2 column 7.
}
type Bar = new (arg: number) => void; // 'arg' is already declared in the upper scope on line 2 column 7.

Copy link
Member Author

@ronami ronami Dec 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, definitely. Thank you @yeonjuan for catching this 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@yeonjuan yeonjuan Dec 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ronami oops. I just edited the comment. I think we should add TSConstructorType also

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I just went over the list of nodes to make sure I didn't miss anything 🙈

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks! 👍

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @yeonjuan for the catch!

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🆒

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit cde2f97 into typescript-eslint:main Dec 31, 2024
62 checks passed
renovate bot added a commit to mmkal/eslint-plugin-mmkal that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
##### [v8.19.1](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8191-2025-01-06)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-assertion] handle literal types ([#10523](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10523))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] doesn't report on shorthand property in an object expression ([#10550](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10550))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[strict-boolean-expressions] remove remaining (unsafe) autofixes ([#10548](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10548))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the `declare` keyword ([#10543](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10543))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-base-to-string] check array generic type ([#10437](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10437))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Kirk Waiblinger
-   mdm317
-   Ronen Amiel
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.19.0 | 8.19.1 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.19.0 | 8.19.1 |


## [v8.19.1](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8191-2025-01-06)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-assertion] handle literal types ([#10523](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10523))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] doesn't report on shorthand property in an object expression ([#10550](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10550))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[strict-boolean-expressions] remove remaining (unsafe) autofixes ([#10548](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10548))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the `declare` keyword ([#10543](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10543))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-base-to-string] check array generic type ([#10437](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10437))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Kirk Waiblinger
-   mdm317
-   Ronen Amiel
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
4 participants