-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] should report readonly class properties with a literal initializer #10618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] should report readonly class properties with a literal initializer #10618
Conversation
Thanks for the PR, @y-hsgw! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a320eaf.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10618 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.00% 87.26% +0.26%
==========================================
Files 447 450 +3
Lines 15586 15715 +129
Branches 4542 4601 +59
==========================================
+ Hits 13560 13714 +154
+ Misses 1671 1645 -26
- Partials 355 356 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
…to fix/no-unnecessary-type-assertion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just minor changes requested. Looks great! 🚀
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The implementation looks great to me, nice! 👍
Requesting changes a bit on tests and potentially checking template literals just once, thanks!
packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍👍 Thanks! looking really good! Requesting small adjustments around testing.
packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one small change I missed previously, other than that this looks fantastic 🏆
packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for pushing this 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
| datasource | package | from | to | | ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | | npm | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.22.0 | 8.23.0 | | npm | @typescript-eslint/parser | 8.22.0 | 8.23.0 | ## [v8.23.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8230-2025-02-03) ##### 🚀 Features - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] enforce strictNullChecks ([#10712](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10712)) ##### 🩹 Fixes - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-shadow] ignore declare variables in definition files shadowing global variables ([#10710](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10710)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-restricted-imports] support regex option ([#10699](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10699)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[dot-notation] handle noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature true ([#10644](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10644)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] fix missing return ([#10732](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10732)) - bump ts-api-utils to ^2.0.1 ([#10761](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10761)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-template-expression] allow interpolating type parameter in type context ([#10739](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10739)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[switch-exhaustiveness-check] suggest with qualified name ([#10697](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10697)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-assertion] should report readonly class properties with a literal initializer ([#10618](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10618)) ##### ❤️ Thank You - Josh Goldberg ✨ - Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal) - Ryan Poon [@sopa301](https://github.com/sopa301) - YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan) - Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw) You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
| datasource | package | from | to | | ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | | npm | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.22.0 | 8.23.0 | | npm | @typescript-eslint/parser | 8.22.0 | 8.23.0 | ## [v8.23.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8230-2025-02-03) ##### 🚀 Features - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] enforce strictNullChecks ([#10712](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10712)) ##### 🩹 Fixes - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-shadow] ignore declare variables in definition files shadowing global variables ([#10710](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10710)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-restricted-imports] support regex option ([#10699](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10699)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[dot-notation] handle noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature true ([#10644](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10644)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] fix missing return ([#10732](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10732)) - bump ts-api-utils to ^2.0.1 ([#10761](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10761)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-template-expression] allow interpolating type parameter in type context ([#10739](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10739)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[switch-exhaustiveness-check] suggest with qualified name ([#10697](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10697)) - **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-assertion] should report readonly class properties with a literal initializer ([#10618](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10618)) ##### ❤️ Thank You - Josh Goldberg ✨ - Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal) - Ryan Poon [@sopa301](https://github.com/sopa301) - YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan) - Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw) You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
PR Checklist
readonly
class properties with a literal initializer #10617Overview
Fixed the bug described in the title.
🐛