Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-duplicate-type-constituents] handle nested types #10638

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor

@yeonjuan yeonjuan commented Jan 11, 2025

PR Checklist

Overview

It addresses #9496.
Changed to recursively traverse constituents to find nested duplicate types.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @yeonjuan!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6b055ae
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/67924c5295d86000087f8898
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10638--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 98 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jan 11, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 6b055ae.

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --... ✅ Succeeded 4s View ↗
nx run-many --target=clean ✅ Succeeded 11s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-01-23 14:26:50 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.19%. Comparing base (31be053) to head (6b055ae).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10638      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.15%   87.19%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         448      450       +2     
  Lines       15576    15632      +56     
  Branches     4551     4570      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits        13575    13630      +55     
  Misses       1645     1645              
- Partials      356      357       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 87.19% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...plugin/src/rules/no-duplicate-type-constituents.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

@yeonjuan yeonjuan marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2025 13:53
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 Thanks, this looks great!

Sorry for the delay. I have to admit I was procrastinating on this one because of how big and intricate the diff looked. But it's another one that actually was a lot more moves than it seemed at first. Phew.

I think the logical changes make sense and the strategy of not checking TSUnionType nodes that are themselves a child of a TSUnionType is a good one.

Just one naming change. If nobody's gotten to it before Monday's release hours I can go ahead and apply it.

Thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Jan 23, 2025
@yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeonjuan commented Jan 23, 2025

Sorry for the delay. I have to admit I was procrastinating on this one because of how big and intricate the diff looked. But it's another one that actually was a lot more moves than it seemed at first. Phew.

@JoshuaKGoldberg
No problem. I understand. It's a hard diff to see. Thanks as always for the review.
I fixed the naming. 6b055ae

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙌 thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 9e8828b into typescript-eslint:main Jan 23, 2025
62 checks passed
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.21.0 | 8.22.0 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.21.0 | 8.22.0 |


## [v8.22.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8220-2025-01-27)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-template-expression] handle template literal type ([#10612](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10612))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-readonly] autofixer doesn't add type to property that is mutated in the constructor ([#10552](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10552))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-extraneous-class] handle accessor keyword ([#10678](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10678))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-shadow] don't report unnecessarily on valid ways of using module augmentation ([#10616](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10616))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-duplicate-type-constituents] handle nested types ([#10638](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10638))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] doesn't report on ternary but on equivalent || ([#10517](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10517))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   mdm317
-   Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.21.0 | 8.22.0 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.21.0 | 8.22.0 |


## [v8.22.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8220-2025-01-27)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-template-expression] handle template literal type ([#10612](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10612))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-readonly] autofixer doesn't add type to property that is mutated in the constructor ([#10552](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10552))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-extraneous-class] handle accessor keyword ([#10678](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10678))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-shadow] don't report unnecessarily on valid ways of using module augmentation ([#10616](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10616))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-duplicate-type-constituents] handle nested types ([#10638](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10638))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] doesn't report on ternary but on equivalent || ([#10517](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10517))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   mdm317
-   Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-duplicate-type-constituents] does not handle nested unions/intersections
2 participants