-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-nullish-coalescing] treat any
/unknown
as eligible for nullish coalescing
#10865
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kirkwaiblinger
merged 9 commits into
typescript-eslint:main
from
kirkwaiblinger:prefer-nullish-coalescing-possibly-nullish
Mar 6, 2025
Merged
fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-nullish-coalescing] treat any
/unknown
as eligible for nullish coalescing
#10865
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1e04761
treat any/unknown as eligible for nullish coalescing
kirkwaiblinger b1fee0c
more stuff
kirkwaiblinger b1aa570
fix typo
kirkwaiblinger 9a39d66
feedback
kirkwaiblinger c356e31
tweaks
kirkwaiblinger 3ca6460
Merge branch 'main' into prefer-nullish-coalescing-possibly-nullish
kirkwaiblinger 62600ca
merge mistake
kirkwaiblinger f82db50
rename vars in test
kirkwaiblinger bea323d
Merge branch 'main' into prefer-nullish-coalescing-possibly-nullish
kirkwaiblinger File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
11 changes: 7 additions & 4 deletions
11
packages/eslint-plugin/tests/docs-eslint-output-snapshots/prefer-nullish-coalescing.shot
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Test]: Can this be simplified to use
.typeParts()
instead of.intersectionTypeParts()
? Changing this doesn't seem to fail any test.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe... I think I'd like to leave that line as is since technically it wasn't touched in this PR though. (The change that I had to make was because the type assertion
type as ts.UnionOrIntersectionType
was no longer valid). It's generally a bit of a smell I think if we treated unions and intersections the same shallowly, but not recursively 🤔 But I don't have a test case in mind