Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-parameters] should parenthesize type in suggestion fixer if necessary #10907

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

y-hsgw
Copy link
Contributor

@y-hsgw y-hsgw commented Mar 2, 2025

PR Checklist

Overview

Fixed the bug described in the title.

Please note that in addition to the error examples in the #10894, I have also addressed several related cases.

🐛

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @y-hsgw!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 30b0c4f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/680fe2abddb3b6000887e598
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10907--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 97 (🔴 down 1 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Mar 2, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 30b0c4f.

Command Status Duration Result
nx test eslint-plugin-internal ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx test rule-tester ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded 1s View ↗
nx typecheck ast-spec ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --... ✅ Succeeded 22s View ↗
nx test utils ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run parser:test -- --coverage ✅ Succeeded 8s View ↗
nx run-many --target=clean ✅ Succeeded 19s View ↗
Additional runs (26) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-04-28 20:37:46 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.83%. Comparing base (1200571) to head (30b0c4f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #10907   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.83%   90.83%           
=======================================
  Files         497      497           
  Lines       50259    50279   +20     
  Branches     8291     8297    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        45652    45672   +20     
  Misses       4592     4592           
  Partials       15       15           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 90.83% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-type-parameters.ts 97.08% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
...ackages/eslint-plugin/src/util/getWrappingFixer.ts 96.29% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 👍

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg dismissed their stale review March 10, 2025 11:45

Wait, was too optimistic - taking a closer look..

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff! I think just a bit of extra testing & code flow trimming are needed now. 🔥

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Mar 10, 2025
@y-hsgw y-hsgw requested a review from JoshuaKGoldberg March 10, 2025 14:08
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Mar 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 Looks great to me, thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Mar 17, 2025
@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger added awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party and removed 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge labels Mar 19, 2025
@y-hsgw y-hsgw requested a review from kirkwaiblinger March 20, 2025 07:37
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Mar 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 will defer to @kirkwaiblinger, as they caught things I didn't last time. LGTM otherwise!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Mar 31, 2025
@kirkwaiblinger
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay!

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger enabled auto-merge (squash) April 28, 2025 04:42
@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger disabled auto-merge April 28, 2025 16:58
@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger merged commit 50ef8d9 into typescript-eslint:main Apr 28, 2025
55 checks passed
@y-hsgw y-hsgw deleted the fix/no-unnecessary-type-parameters branch April 28, 2025 23:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-unnecessary-type-parameters] should parenthesize type in suggestion fixer if necessary
3 participants