-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
feat(eslint-plugin): add extension rule dot-notation
#1867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(eslint-plugin): add extension rule dot-notation
#1867
Conversation
Thanks for the PR, @anikethsaha! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1867 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.37% 94.37% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 167 168 +1
Lines 7629 7644 +15
Branches 2192 2195 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 7200 7214 +14
Misses 183 183
- Partials 246 247 +1
|
I do think here also, the coverage might because of the optional chains |
dot-notation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few comments around the docs, otherwise lgtm.
thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks!
thanks a lot for quick reviews and all those helping changes. |
added new extended rule
dot-notation
Refer #789, #789 (comment)