-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [return-await] correct handling of ternaries #2168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks for the PR, @yeonjuan! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day. |
@bradzacher |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2168 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.45% 93.45%
=======================================
Files 171 171
Lines 7810 7813 +3
Branches 2228 2227 -1
=======================================
+ Hits 7299 7302 +3
Misses 244 244
Partials 267 267
|
@bradzacher It seems ready to be reviewed :) sorry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one nitpick, otherwise LGTM - thanks for this!
// There should always be a target node; but let's be safe. | ||
/* istanbul ignore if */ if (!targetNode) { | ||
/* istanbul ignore if */ if (!node) { | ||
return null; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you don't need this if
any more, because the argument is never undefined
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bradzacher Sure!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for your work!
Fixes #1838