Skip to content

chore: update issue templates #2397

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2020
Merged

Conversation

bradzacher
Copy link
Member

I didn't want to add another comment to the template, as there's already enough that I don't think people read anyways.
So I've added a simple checklist to every template (for the first 3).

A few common problems people have when filing issues:

  1. people don't ever restart their IDE.
    Often times they've done git rebases, yarn installs/removals, added and deleted folders, and just generally caused things to get into a weird state.
    Restarting the IDE almost always fixes the issue.

  2. people are running an old version of the package.
    In some cases people have filed issues using a 3+ month old versions of the tooling.
    Updating ensures that they have all the latest fixes.

  3. people haven't read the FAQ.
    I've tried to keep it up-to-date with concise and helpful information, but some people just don't read it.
    So it's a hard link to force them to check it.

  4. people file issues against eslint-plugin-tslint or parser when they meant to file it against eslint-plugin.
    I can sort of understand this, because there are a lot of packages.
    So I've added a big STOP section to every template to help point people to the right template.

  5. Issues are not reproducible due to it being a user config error.
    There have been a decent number of issues that just weren't reproducible based on the issue filed.
    When asked to create a repro repo, the issue reporters were either unable to create an isolated repro, or they figured out their bad config when creating the isolated repro.
    This one is hard, because we can't reasonably expect every reporter to create a repro repo for their issue.
    I've added a one line note, maybe that inspires someone and wards off some noise.

I didn't want to add another comment to the template, as there's already enough that I don't think people read anyways.
So I've added a simple checklist to every template.

A few common problems people have when filing issues:

1) people don't ever restart their IDE.
Often times they've done git rebases, yarn installs/removals, added and deleted folders, and just generally caused things to get into a weird state.
Restarting the IDE almost always fixes the issue.

2) people are running an old version of the package.
In some cases people have filed issues using a 3+ month old versions of the tooling.
Updating ensures that they have all the latest fixes.

3) people haven't read the FAQ.
I've tried to keep it up-to-date with concise and helpful information, but some people just don't read it.
So it's a hard link to force them to check it.

4) people file issues against `eslint-plugin-tslint` or `parser` when they meant to file it against `eslint-plugin`.
I can _sort of_ understand this, because there are a lot of packages.
So I've added a big ***STOP*** section to every template to help point people to the right template.

5) Issues are not reproducible due to it being a user config error.
There have been a decent number of issues that just weren't reproducible based on the issue filed.
When asked to create a repro repo, the issue reporters were either unable to create an isolated repro, or they figured out their bad config when creating the isolated repro.
This one is hard, because we can't reasonably expect every reporter to create a repro repo for their issue.
I've added a one line note, maybe that inspires someone and wards off some noise.
@bradzacher bradzacher added the documentation Documentation ("docs") that needs adding/updating label Aug 17, 2020
@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @bradzacher!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 17, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2397 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2397   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.16%   93.16%           
=======================================
  Files         286      286           
  Lines        9161     9161           
  Branches     2517     2517           
=======================================
  Hits         8535     8535           
  Misses        301      301           
  Partials      325      325           
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittest 93.16% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@bradzacher bradzacher added repo maintenance things to do with maintenance of the repo, and not with code/docs and removed documentation Documentation ("docs") that needs adding/updating labels Aug 17, 2020
@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit 6f397df into master Aug 17, 2020
@bradzacher bradzacher deleted the issue-template-updates-aug-17-2020 branch August 17, 2020 23:38
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
repo maintenance things to do with maintenance of the repo, and not with code/docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant