Skip to content

chore: enable restrict-plus-operands internally #3282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

Continues #3278.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @JoshuaKGoldberg!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day.

@bradzacher bradzacher added the repo maintenance things to do with maintenance of the repo, and not with code/docs label Apr 13, 2021
Copy link
Member

@bradzacher bradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

noice

@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit 26d71b5 into typescript-eslint:master Apr 13, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 14, 2021
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg deleted the restrict-plus-operands branch November 17, 2021 07:45
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
repo maintenance things to do with maintenance of the repo, and not with code/docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants