Skip to content

chore: revert 508bb41 #534

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2019
Merged

chore: revert 508bb41 #534

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2019

Conversation

bradzacher
Copy link
Member

@bradzacher bradzacher commented May 16, 2019

Reverts #530
508bb41

Accidentally merged this PR early.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #534 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #534   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.21%   94.21%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines        4235     4235           
  Branches     1153     1153           
=======================================
  Hits         3990     3990           
  Misses        143      143           
  Partials      102      102
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ackages/experimental-utils/src/ts-eslint/Linter.ts 0% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
packages/typescript-estree/src/semantic-errors.ts 87.5% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...ckages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-magic-numbers.ts 93.33% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...ages/experimental-utils/src/ts-eslint/CLIEngine.ts 0% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...ges/experimental-utils/src/ts-eslint/SourceCode.ts 0% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
packages/typescript-estree/src/ast-converter.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
...ages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/prefer-regexp-exec.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
packages/typescript-estree/src/parser.ts 95% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit c480eab into master May 16, 2019
@bradzacher bradzacher deleted the revert-530-tighter-linting branch May 16, 2019 03:17
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants