Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-jest to v27 #6233

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 17, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-plugin-jest ^26.1.5 -> ^27.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest

v27.1.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v27.1.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • ensure rule fixes produce valid code when function params and args have trailing commas (#​1282) (8eca0b7)

v27.1.5

Compare Source

Performance Improvements
  • use Set instead of iterating, and deduplicate a function (#​1278) (0e048f1)

v27.1.4

Compare Source

Performance Improvements
  • don't collect more info than needed when resolving jest functions (#​1275) (e4a5674)

v27.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v27.1.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: adjust grammar in rule message (#​1264) (4494ed2)

v27.1.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v27.1.0

Compare Source

Features

27.0.4 (2022-09-10)

Bug Fixes

27.0.3 (2022-09-09)

Bug Fixes

27.0.2 (2022-09-08)

Bug Fixes
  • no-restricted-matchers: improve check to not be solely based on the start of the matcher chain (#​1236) (5fe4568), closes #​1235

27.0.1 (2022-08-28)

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-expect-assertions: report on concise arrow functions with expect call (#​1225) (64ec9c1)

v27.0.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v27.0.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v27.0.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-restricted-matchers: improve check to not be solely based on the start of the matcher chain (#​1236) (5fe4568), closes #​1235

v27.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-expect-assertions: report on concise arrow functions with expect call (#​1225) (64ec9c1)

v27.0.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • unbound-method: don't suppress errors from base rule (#​1219) (7c1389e)
Features
BREAKING CHANGES
  • no-alias-methods is now recommended as the methods themselves will be removed in the next major version of Jest
  • no-jest-import: removed no-jest-import rule
  • unbound-method: errors thrown by the unbound-method base rule are no longer suppressed - really this means that if you don't specify project when this rule is enabled and @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin is present, that error will no longer be suppressed instead of silently doing nothing; it will still not throw if this rule is enabled without the base rule being present
  • no-restricted-matchers: no-restricted-matchers now checks against the start of the expect chain, meaning you have to explicitly list each possible matcher & modifier permutations that you want to restrict
  • Support for ESLint version 6 is removed
  • Node versions 12 and 17 are no longer supported

v26.9.0

Compare Source

Features

26.8.7 (2022-08-21)

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-expect-assertions: report on concise arrow functions (#​1207) (f928747)

26.8.6 (2022-08-21)

Bug Fixes
  • max-expect: reset expect counter when entering and exiting test function calls (#​1206) (3908ab8)

26.8.5 (2022-08-20)

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-expect-assertions: use scoped based jest fn call parser for expect checks (#​1201) (fd54ca1)

26.8.4 (2022-08-19)

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-mock-promise-shorthand: ignore mockImplementation functions that have parameters (#​1199) (78ccbef)

26.8.3 (2022-08-15)

Performance Improvements

26.8.2 (2022-08-09)

Bug Fixes
  • max-expects: don't count expect.<member>() calls towards max (#​1194) (75a0ff2)

26.8.1 (2022-08-08)

Bug Fixes
  • no-standalone-expect: only report on expect.hasAssertions & expect.assertions member calls (#​1191) (4bf9eea)

v26.8.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-expect-assertions: report on concise arrow functions (#​1207) (f928747)

v26.8.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • max-expect: reset expect counter when entering and exiting test function calls (#​1206) (3908ab8)

v26.8.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-expect-assertions: use scoped based jest fn call parser for expect checks (#​1201) (fd54ca1)

v26.8.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-mock-promise-shorthand: ignore mockImplementation functions that have parameters (#​1199) (78ccbef)

v26.8.3

Compare Source

Performance Improvements

v26.8.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • max-expects: don't count expect.<member>() calls towards max (#​1194) (75a0ff2)

v26.8.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-standalone-expect: only report on expect.hasAssertions & expect.assertions member calls (#​1191) (4bf9eea)

v26.8.0

Compare Source

Features

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @renovate[bot]!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 17, 2022

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 9f6b91d. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 47 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@renovate renovate bot added dependencies Issue about dependencies of the package javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Dec 17, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 17, 2022

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9f6b91d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/63a9d74c009b340008213886
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-6233--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency eslint-plugin-jest to v27 chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-jest to v27 Dec 17, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-jest-27.x branch 4 times, most recently from 3045c68 to a4abdb3 Compare December 21, 2022 23:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-jest-27.x branch from a4abdb3 to 9f6b91d Compare December 26, 2022 17:18
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit c5c9359 into main Dec 30, 2022
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg deleted the renovate/eslint-plugin-jest-27.x branch December 30, 2022 21:29
tapanprakasht pushed a commit to tapanprakasht/typescript-eslint that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2022
…eslint#6233)

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
dependencies Issue about dependencies of the package javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant