chore(website): [playground] add copy as json and simplify ast viewer #6728
Conversation
- add copy as json - ast viewer is now more generic
|
Thanks for the PR, @armano2! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
not sure about what issue you have during local dev, but there was actual issue with undefined, i missed one thing while moving this change to standalone PR |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v6 #6728 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.15% 87.46% +2.31%
==========================================
Files 383 374 -9
Lines 13026 12879 -147
Branches 3839 3811 -28
==========================================
+ Hits 11092 11265 +173
+ Misses 1572 1229 -343
- Partials 362 385 +23
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
|
i did some profiling on update tree, and I refactored code to be a little faster |
| ScriptKind: extractEnum(window.ts.ScriptKind), | ||
| ScriptTarget: extractEnum(window.ts.ScriptTarget), | ||
| LanguageVariant: extractEnum(window.ts.LanguageVariant), | ||
| // @ts-expect-error: non public API |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[Docs] Is there a tracking issue on TypeScript to expose this? (I couldn't find one) If not, could you please file one? And either way, link the issue here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is intentionally a private API, and normally ts doesn't expose properties that have this in their types.
ast viewer actually prints both public and internal properties of object's and some of them normally are accessible trough functions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I'm thinking if it's a API that we care about & would want to show, it'd make sense to ask for it to be turned public.
PR Checklist
Overview
migrate ast viewer changes from #6656
this change is required to implement type viewer
notable changes: