-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-condition] allow nullish coalescing for naked type parameter #6910
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-condition] allow nullish coalescing for naked type parameter #6910
Conversation
…ng for naked type parameter
Thanks for the PR, @dora1998! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6910 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.36% 87.37%
=======================================
Files 386 386
Lines 13189 13192 +3
Branches 3866 3867 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 11523 11526 +3
Misses 1300 1300
Partials 366 366
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for just the case of a type parameter, thanks! Just requesting a bit more test coverage please. ✨
} | ||
`, | ||
` | ||
function test<T>(a: T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Testing] The cases of T extends 'a'
(always truthy) and T extends 'a' | null
(still needing ??
) seem to work, but aren't explicitly covered for ??
cases. Could you add in a couple more unit tests along those lines please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh sorry, I added them!
I also added a alwaysNullish
case 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯 thanks!
PR Checklist
Overview
Allow nullish coalescing for a naked type parameter because it might be nullable.