-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
Revert "feat(typescript-estree): add EXPERIMENTAL_useProjectService option to use TypeScript project service" #7251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks for the PR, @JoshuaKGoldberg! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
I'm trying this out locally on the TypeScript repo to make sure it fixes the issue... Edit: it does. |
{ | ||
...ts.sys, | ||
getCurrentDirectory: () => parseSettings.tsconfigRootDir, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe this change that broke it??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ooh maybe! I'll try it out.
Still going to merge this PR just to be safe. Now that we know there's at least one untested thing I want to be more thorough in trying this out in other community repos. Talked with Brad - this is one of the few touches to existing code, and seems to be the most impactful. We'll go with just fixing this one spot.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ha. Yes, it does.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7251 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.47% 87.58% +0.10%
==========================================
Files 379 377 -2
Lines 13234 13205 -29
Branches 3906 3901 -5
==========================================
- Hits 11577 11565 -12
+ Misses 1279 1261 -18
- Partials 378 379 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Reverts #6754.
Fixes #7246.