-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [non-nullable-type-assertion-style] consider operator precedence when fixing #7289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ator precedence when fixing
Thanks for the PR, @auvred! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7289 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.41% 87.42% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 381 381
Lines 13321 13324 +3
Branches 3938 3939 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 11645 11649 +4
+ Misses 1298 1297 -1
Partials 378 378
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look great, thanks! Just requesting a splitup of the tests. ✨
packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/non-nullable-type-assertion-style.test.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯 thanks!
PR Checklist
await
#7243Overview
We need to wrap expression in parentheses if operator precedence is lower or equal to
OperatorPrecedence.Unary
Thanks to #7243 (comment)