Skip to content

chore: enable eslint-plugin-perfectionist on ast-spec package #9842

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

PR Checklist

Overview

Enables sorting on packages/ast-spec.

💖

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @JoshuaKGoldberg!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 494f6d6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/66c8b1147ffba50008ab34a1
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9842--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 90 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

bradzacher
bradzacher previously approved these changes Aug 21, 2024
raw: string;
type: AST_NODE_TYPES.Literal;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would love it if we could force type to be first, always.
I'm not going to block on it as alpha sorting is king.

But for ast-spec specifically always defining type first is really nice.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, agreed. I can mess around with https://perfectionist.dev/rules/sort-imports#groups ...

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Aug 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.04%. Comparing base (ee38b52) to head (494f6d6).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9842   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.04%   88.04%           
=======================================
  Files         407      407           
  Lines       13948    13948           
  Branches     4078     4078           
=======================================
  Hits        12280    12280           
  Misses       1355     1355           
  Partials      313      313           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 88.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 88b44ce into typescript-eslint:main Aug 24, 2024
57 of 59 checks passed
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg deleted the perfectionist-ast-spec branch August 24, 2024 17:03
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 1, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants