-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Rationalize references to "lang_names" in Python routines #522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @sven-oly, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on minor but impactful refactorings to how regular expressions are managed within the language name generation logic, enhancing module independence. Additionally, it includes a crucial fix to the known issues verification process, ensuring accurate and sequential evaluation of test types.
Highlights
- Refactored Regex Usage: Regular expression definitions for blank lines and comment lines have been moved from a shared
common
module directly into thelang_names.py
andlocaleDisplayNames.py
generator files. This reduces external dependencies and makes these modules more self-contained. - Improved Conditional Logic: A logical correction was made in
check_known_issues.py
by changing anif
statement to anelif
for thedatetime_fmt
test type check. This ensures that test types are evaluated correctly in sequence, preventing unintended fall-through.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors two generator scripts (lang_names.py
and localeDisplayNames.py
) to remove a dependency on a common
module by defining regular expressions locally. It also includes a small fix in check_known_issues.py
to correctly use an elif
statement. My review focuses on the Python files. I've suggested improvements to the regex handling in the generator scripts for better performance and adherence to PEP 8 naming conventions by defining them as constants at the module level. The change in check_known_issues.py
is correct and improves the code logic.
Removed the old data generator. |
No description provided.