Skip to content

Clarify eager vs. lazy evaluation #476

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023
Merged

Clarify eager vs. lazy evaluation #476

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

aphillips
Copy link
Member

Adds normative note stating that this specification doesn't require either eager nor lazy evaluation.

aphillips and others added 2 commits September 14, 2023 09:40
@aphillips
Clarify eager vs. lazy evaluation
8fb112f 
Adds normative note stating that this specification doesn't require either eager nor lazy evaluation.
@github-actions
style: Apply Prettier
5ce1d15
@aphillips aphillips added normative Issue affects normative text in the specification formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec labels Sep 14, 2023
@aphillips aphillips merged commit 3f283fa into main Sep 18, 2023
@aphillips aphillips deleted the aphillips-eager-vs-lazy branch September 18, 2023 17:46
@aphillips aphillips mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stasm stasm stasm approved these changes

@eemeli eemeli eemeli approved these changes

@catamorphism catamorphism Awaiting requested review from catamorphism

@mihnita mihnita Awaiting requested review from mihnita

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
formatting Issue pertains to the formatting section of the spec normative Issue affects normative text in the specification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@aphillips @stasm @eemeli