-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
Segmentation test cases are being generated based on data for the previous version of Unicode #1072
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I understand the issue. Segmenter.java parses its UnicodeSets using For a binary-query-expression, the The root cause is that there are no fewer than six |
Probably stating the obvious: |
Agreed.
…On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 10:40 AM Markus Scherer ***@***.***> wrote:
it fails silently (returning false), which means that we then use ICU
properties
Probably stating the obvious:
In the context of the Unicode Tools, we should never "fall back" to ICU
properties, especially not silently.
Use of ICU properties should be limited to consistency testing and
comparison tools, if any.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1072 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACJLEMA35QC3UZJBYO6MYLL2VWOCVAVCNFSM6AAAAABZRA3TISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONBVGM4DCNJVGM>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
[image: markusicu]*markusicu* left a comment
(unicode-org/unicodetools#1072)
<#1072 (comment)>
it fails silently (returning false), which means that we then use ICU
properties
Probably stating the obvious:
In the context of the Unicode Tools, we should never "fall back" to ICU
properties, especially not silently.
Use of ICU properties should be limited to consistency testing and
comparison tools, if any.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1072 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACJLEMA35QC3UZJBYO6MYLL2VWOCVAVCNFSM6AAAAABZRA3TISVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONBVGM4DCNJVGM>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
See the Unicode mailing list email titled Question Regarding UCD Draft Files and GraphemeBreakTest Discrepancy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: