Skip to content

Conversation

@tommady tommady marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2023 03:53
@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, i didn't merge it
it is great. I am just a bit sad that we have to recompile it every time (3 minutes instead 1)
would it be possible to have the task running one after the other in the same VM ?

@tommady
Copy link
Contributor Author

tommady commented Oct 28, 2023

Sorry, i didn't merge it it is great. I am just a bit sad that we have to recompile it every time (3 minutes instead 1) would it be possible to have the task running one after the other in the same VM ?

yes it can be, but if we do that it will miss the goal:

run them into dedicated tasks (one per fuzzer)

which I understand is running all the fuzz tests in parallel.
right?

@tommady
Copy link
Contributor Author

tommady commented Oct 28, 2023

or let me think of a way to reduce the compile time.

@tommady
Copy link
Contributor Author

tommady commented Oct 28, 2023

oh I am sorry, the fuzz test already using the

- uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2

so I think there is nothing I can do right now 😞

@tommady
Copy link
Contributor Author

tommady commented Oct 31, 2023

Hi @sylvestre
how about this
image

sorry for the misunderstanding
I thought the Swatinem/rust-cache@v2 action could cache everything,
but after reading the doc and the cargo-fuzz doc,
I found out I was so wrong.

please review this PR again while you have time.
thanks

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit 615b562 into uutils:main Oct 31, 2023
@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

This is perfect, many thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

github action: split the run of the fuzzers
2 participants