Skip to content

shred: document simplified (better?) number of random passes #7847

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/extensions.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -97,3 +97,7 @@ Similar to the proc-ps implementation and unlike GNU/Coreutils, `uptime` provide
## `base32/base64/basenc`

Just like on macOS, `base32/base64/basenc` provides `-D` to decode data.

## `shred`

The number of random passes is deterministic in both GNU and uutils. However, uutils `shred` computes the number of random passes in a simplified way, specifically `max(3, x / 10)`, which is very close but not identical to the number of random passes that GNU would do. This also satisfies an expectation that reasonable users might have, namely that the number of random passes increases monotonically with the number of passes overall; GNU `shred` violates this assumption.
Loading