-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 432
Added reflection support #227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a13fc5a
Added reflection support
cdd6366
fixed review issues
07eff38
fixed review issues
49e9c90
fixed corner case with constructor
614b008
fixed codestyle
a362138
fixed codestyle in test.ts and reflect.ts to match project codestyle
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ | ||
import { VueConstructor } from 'vue' | ||
|
||
export type StringToArrayMap = { | ||
[key: string]: Array<string> | ||
} | ||
|
||
export type ReflectionMap = { | ||
constructor: Array<string>, | ||
instance: StringToArrayMap, | ||
static: StringToArrayMap | ||
} | ||
|
||
export function reflectionIsSupported () { | ||
return (Reflect && Reflect.defineMetadata) !== undefined | ||
} | ||
|
||
export function copyReflectionMetadata ( | ||
from: VueConstructor, | ||
to: VueConstructor, | ||
reflectionMap: ReflectionMap | ||
) { | ||
shallowCopy(from.prototype, to.prototype, reflectionMap.instance) | ||
shallowCopy(from, to, reflectionMap.static) | ||
shallowCopy(from, to, {'constructor': reflectionMap.constructor}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
function shallowCopy (from: VueConstructor, to: VueConstructor, propertyKeys: StringToArrayMap) { | ||
for (const propertyKey in propertyKeys) { | ||
propertyKeys[propertyKey].forEach((metadataKey) => { | ||
if (propertyKey == 'constructor') { | ||
const metadata = Reflect.getOwnMetadata(metadataKey, from) | ||
Reflect.defineMetadata(metadataKey, metadata, to) | ||
} else { | ||
const metadata = Reflect.getOwnMetadata(metadataKey, from, propertyKey) | ||
Reflect.defineMetadata(metadataKey, metadata, to, propertyKey) | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need such temporary object and to process for it in different functions? Why don't we just directly assign the original metadata to component properties?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean
ComponentOptions
? If you mean that, it's a tricky way because i don't want to change options interface and expose internal work ofComponent
decorator.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I don't mean that.
I mean why we need to store metadata in temporary object rather than just forward them directly on the place.
https://github.com/vuejs/vue-class-component/pull/227/files#diff-7db1d7c8dc88ce00d1aa236fa0c128ccR40
https://github.com/vuejs/vue-class-component/pull/227/files#diff-7db1d7c8dc88ce00d1aa236fa0c128ccR118
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because forwarding code will be duplicated. If you okay with that, I'll do it in the way you are asking. Also, we don't have a new class object until almost the end of function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, then we can extract the logic as a function. I believe we can remove
reflectionMap
without duplication.something like:
Then we just call it inline: