Skip to content

一个目录符号的展示格式略有点小问题 #177

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2017
Merged

一个目录符号的展示格式略有点小问题 #177

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion source/c10/p03_import_submodules_by_relative_names.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
像mypackage.A这样使用绝对路径名的不利之处是这将顶层包名硬编码到你的源码中。如果你想重新组织它，你的代码将更脆，很难工作。 举个例子，如果你改变了包名，你就必须检查所有文件来修正源码。 同样，硬编码的名称会使移动代码变得困难。举个例子，也许有人想安装两个不同版本的软件包，只通过名称区分它们。 如果使用相对导入，那一切都ok，然而使用绝对路径名很可能会出问题。


import语句的 ``.`` 和 ``..``看起来很滑稽, 但它指定目录名.为当前目录，..B为目录../B。这种语法只适用于import。
import语句的 ``.`` 和 ``..`` 看起来很滑稽, 但它指定目录名.为当前目录，..B为目录../B。这种语法只适用于import。
举个例子：

.. code-block:: python
Expand Down