Paul Tilley
Related Authors
Filippo Salustri
Toronto Metropolitan University
Ümit Işıkdağ
Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University
Rafael Sacks
Technion Israel Institute of Technology
Glenn Ballard
University of California, Berkeley
José Luis Ponz Tienda
Universidad de los Andes (Colombia)
Quan Nguyen
Hanoi University of Civil Engineering
Luis Alarcon
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Hashem Izadi Moud
Florida Gulf Coast University
Wulfram I. Ervianto
Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University
InterestsView All (11)
Uploads
Papers by Paul Tilley
To carry out the study, the industry was partitioned into two sectors – designers and contractors – with each being surveyed separately using different survey forms. The various industry organisations representing both designers and contractors were actively involved in the development and distribution of the survey documents.
The overall aims of the study were to:
• identify those issues which affect design and documentation quality;
• determine whether there has been any changes over the past 15 years in the levels of design and documentation quality;
• determine what impact changing design and documentation quality standards may have on construction process efficiency; and
• assess the impact of these changes on project cost and time.
The aim of this report is to provide a detailed comparison of the results of both the designers’ and contractors’ surveys and to highlight any similarities or differences in the responses from the members of the different industry organisations surveyed. A complete analysis of the results coming from either the designers’ or contractors’ surveys are looked at individually and are the subject of separate reports.
To carry out the study, the industry was partitioned into two sectors – designers and contractors – with each being surveyed separately using different survey forms. To ensure that the survey addressed only pertinent issues, industry workshops were undertaken as part of the background investigation stage of the study. These workshops, designed to obtain a cross-section of up-to-date industry opinion on the issues, provided valuable industry information that was used in the development of the survey questionnaires. The various industry organisations representing both designers and contractors were also actively involved in the development and distribution of the survey documents.
The overall aims of the study were to:
• identify those issues which affect design and documentation quality;
• determine whether there has been any changes over the past 15 years in the levels of design and documentation quality;
• determine what impact changing design and documentation quality standards may have on construction process efficiency; and
• assess the impact of these changes on project cost and time.
It should be noted however that whilst outlining the aims and objectives of the overall study, this report has been prepared specifically in relation to the results achieved from the contractors’ survey only. The results of the designers’ survey and a comparative analysis of the two sets of results are the subject of separate reports.
To carry out the study, the industry was partitioned into two sectors – designers and contractors – with each being surveyed separately using different survey forms. The various industry organisations representing both designers and contractors were actively involved in the development and distribution of the survey documents.
The overall aims of the study were to:
• identify those issues which affect design and documentation quality;
• determine whether there has been any changes over the past 15 years in the levels of design and documentation quality;
• determine what impact changing design and documentation quality standards may have on construction process efficiency; and
• assess the impact of these changes on project cost and time.
It should be noted however that whilst outlining the aims and objectives of the overall study, this report has been prepared specifically in relation to the results achieved from the designers’ survey only. The results of the contractors’ survey and a comparative analysis of the two sets of results are the subject of separate reports.