Istvan Kenesei
Related Authors
Selçuk İşsever
Ankara University
Na'ama Pat-El
The University of Texas at Austin
Rachel Nordlinger
University of Melbourne
Eitan Grossman
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Martin Haspelmath
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Alexandru Nicolae
"Iorgu Iordan - Al. Rosetti" Institute of Linguistics, Bucharest
Probal Dasgupta
Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta
Massimo Cerruti
Università degli Studi di Torino
Hagit Borer
Queen Mary, University of London
Viacheslav Kuleshov
Stockholm University
Uploads
Papers by Istvan Kenesei
in Hungarian (or CENs hereunder) do not arise through a purely lexical process
involving a change in argument structure (demotion, promotion and the like) but are a result
of a syntactic derivation that crucially relies on the assumption that CENs have clausal
properties. I will rst review earlier work demonstrating that undisputed nonnite clauses
in Hungarian exhibit more arguments than had been thought to exist before. The method
of acquiring this evidence is introduced and its consequences explained. This move is
necessary because similar arguments will be made use of in discussing at least one aspect
of CENs, which will point towards the need to accept the clausal derivation. Then
new data will be listed showing that CENs, too, have more argument positions than can
be accommodated in the previous proposals and that properties of (non)resumption are
incompatible with lexical derivation. Finally, a somewhat intricate new analysis will be
presented, which is based on den Dikken's (1999) analysis of Hungarian possessive DPs.
in Hungarian (or CENs hereunder) do not arise through a purely lexical process
involving a change in argument structure (demotion, promotion and the like) but are a result
of a syntactic derivation that crucially relies on the assumption that CENs have clausal
properties. I will rst review earlier work demonstrating that undisputed nonnite clauses
in Hungarian exhibit more arguments than had been thought to exist before. The method
of acquiring this evidence is introduced and its consequences explained. This move is
necessary because similar arguments will be made use of in discussing at least one aspect
of CENs, which will point towards the need to accept the clausal derivation. Then
new data will be listed showing that CENs, too, have more argument positions than can
be accommodated in the previous proposals and that properties of (non)resumption are
incompatible with lexical derivation. Finally, a somewhat intricate new analysis will be
presented, which is based on den Dikken's (1999) analysis of Hungarian possessive DPs.
Katalin E. Kiss, The syntax of Hungarian (Cambridge Syntax Guides). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Pp. xii+278.
Laszlo Varga, Intonation and stress : evidence from Hungarian. Houndmills :Palgrave MacMillan, 2002. Pp. xvii+229.
Laszlo Hunyadi, Hungarian sentence prosody and universal grammar. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002. Pp. 328.