Peter Foreman
Related Authors
Hemin Koyi
Uppsala University
Jana Javornik
University of East London
Graham Martin
University of Leicester
Gwen Robbins Schug
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Gabriel Gutierrez-Alonso
University of Salamanca
John Sutton
Macquarie University
Eros Carvalho
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Kevin Arbuckle
Swansea University
Jesper Hoffmeyer
University of Copenhagen
Roshan Chitrakar
Nepal College of Information Technology
Uploads
Papers by Peter Foreman
KEY WORDS: organizational identity, comprehensive review, methodologies, operationalization, measurement, classification framework
deductive type of studies. Believing that this stems in large part from insufficient
construct clarity (Suddaby, 2010), this theory-development initiative presents an expanded conceptual framework. The authors exploit several key elements of individual identity and make the case for using these as the basis for conceptualizing an organizational-level equivalent. Starting with the premise that an individual’s identity is the product of comparisons, two dimensions are identified: the type of comparison (similarity, difference), referred to as the “identity conundrum,” and the object of comparison (self–other, self–self), referred to as the “identity perspective.” The authors then propose a four-cell distinctive conceptual domain for OI and explore its implications for scholarship.
Keywords: Organizational identity; individual identity; construct clarity; identity construct; identity conundrum; CREAD framework
KEY WORDS: organizational identity, comprehensive review, methodologies, operationalization, measurement, classification framework
deductive type of studies. Believing that this stems in large part from insufficient
construct clarity (Suddaby, 2010), this theory-development initiative presents an expanded conceptual framework. The authors exploit several key elements of individual identity and make the case for using these as the basis for conceptualizing an organizational-level equivalent. Starting with the premise that an individual’s identity is the product of comparisons, two dimensions are identified: the type of comparison (similarity, difference), referred to as the “identity conundrum,” and the object of comparison (self–other, self–self), referred to as the “identity perspective.” The authors then propose a four-cell distinctive conceptual domain for OI and explore its implications for scholarship.
Keywords: Organizational identity; individual identity; construct clarity; identity construct; identity conundrum; CREAD framework