CHUN, J. — This case concerns the efforts of U.S. Bank National
Association (US Bank) to foreclos... more CHUN, J. — This case concerns the efforts of U.S. Bank National Association (US Bank) to foreclose on property owned by Daniel and Kristi Peterson (Property). In a previous appeal, U.S. Bank National Association v. Peterson, we reversed the trial court’s denial of the Petersons’ motion to vacate a default judgment against them. Since remand, the trial court granted summary judgment against the Petersons on US Bank’s foreclosure claim. The Petersons appeal, arguing that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction because US Bank’s attorney did not sign its summons. We agree. We reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether the Petersons properly moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and to consider any motion by US Bank to amend the summons. We also grant the Petersons’ request for attorney fees
CHUN, J. — This case concerns the efforts of U.S. Bank National
Association (US Bank) to foreclos... more CHUN, J. — This case concerns the efforts of U.S. Bank National Association (US Bank) to foreclose on property owned by Daniel and Kristi Peterson (Property). In a previous appeal, U.S. Bank National Association v. Peterson, we reversed the trial court’s denial of the Petersons’ motion to vacate a default judgment against them. Since remand, the trial court granted summary judgment against the Petersons on US Bank’s foreclosure claim. The Petersons appeal, arguing that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction because US Bank’s attorney did not sign its summons. We agree. We reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether the Petersons properly moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and to consider any motion by US Bank to amend the summons. We also grant the Petersons’ request for attorney fees
Uploads
Papers by Dan Peterson
Association (US Bank) to foreclose on property owned by Daniel and Kristi
Peterson (Property). In a previous appeal, U.S. Bank National Association v.
Peterson, we reversed the trial court’s denial of the Petersons’ motion to vacate a default judgment against them. Since remand, the trial court granted summary judgment against the Petersons on US Bank’s foreclosure claim. The Petersons appeal, arguing that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction because US Bank’s attorney did not sign its summons. We agree. We reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether the Petersons properly moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and to consider any motion by US Bank to amend the summons. We also grant the Petersons’ request for attorney fees
Association (US Bank) to foreclose on property owned by Daniel and Kristi
Peterson (Property). In a previous appeal, U.S. Bank National Association v.
Peterson, we reversed the trial court’s denial of the Petersons’ motion to vacate a default judgment against them. Since remand, the trial court granted summary judgment against the Petersons on US Bank’s foreclosure claim. The Petersons appeal, arguing that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction because US Bank’s attorney did not sign its summons. We agree. We reverse and remand for the trial court to determine whether the Petersons properly moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and to consider any motion by US Bank to amend the summons. We also grant the Petersons’ request for attorney fees