Papers by Horia-Roman Patapievici
"The reflective work of Romanian artist and Prix Marcel Duchamp winner Mircea Cantor (b. 197... more "The reflective work of Romanian artist and Prix Marcel Duchamp winner Mircea Cantor (b. 1977) is the subject of a rennie collection at Wing Sang exhibition this winter. This is the first solo presentation of his work in Canada. While Cantor works in a number of different mediums, he is best known for his ostensibly simple video narratives that slowly build to subtle but powerful climax leaving the audience with conclusions that keep them thinking well beyond the exhibition." -- publisher's website
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Va celebrata l'iniziativa della casa editrice Lindau di pubblicare un testo di Ioan Petru Cul... more Va celebrata l'iniziativa della casa editrice Lindau di pubblicare un testo di Ioan Petru Culianu sinora inedito in Italia: Iocari serio. Scienza e arte nel pensiero del Rinascimento. Operazione condotta calando sul tavolo tre carichi: curatela, traduzione dal romeno e premessa all'edizione italiana di Horia Corneliu Cicorta , presentazione di Tereza Culianu-Petrescu (sorellaș dell'Autore) e postfazione di Horia-Roman Patapievici.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Orizont, 2017
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Page 1. Flying Against the Arrow JAn InteCCectuaC in Ceau$escus "Romania Horia-Roman Patapie... more Page 1. Flying Against the Arrow JAn InteCCectuaC in Ceau$escus "Romania Horia-Roman Patapievici Page 2. Page 3. Page 4. The 'unbearable 80s', as the last decade of the Ceausescu era has been called in Romania, are in the focus of this quasi-autobiographical work. ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Translated from the best selling Romanian edition, Flying against the Arrow, this quasi-autobiogr... more Translated from the best selling Romanian edition, Flying against the Arrow, this quasi-autobiographical book describes the life of an intellectual living under extreme political conditions, paying particular attention to the 'unbearable 80s'. The book vividly portrays the difficulties encountered by a young intellectual trying to shape himself under the oppressive Ceausescu regime and provides a stark depiction of a man's intellectual suffocation under hard-line socialist rule. The book's overall significance is therefore far more wideranging than just Romania or the 1980s.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
ABSTRACT: Pierre Duhem is the discoverer of the physics of the Middle Ages. The discovery that th... more ABSTRACT: Pierre Duhem is the discoverer of the physics of the Middle Ages. The discovery that there existed a physics of the Middle Ages was a surprise primarily for Duhem himself. This discovery completely changed the way he saw the evolution of physics, bringing him to formulate a complex argument for the growth and continuity of scientific knowledge, which I call the ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis’ (not to be confused either with what Roger Ariew called the ‘true Duhem thesis’ as opposed to the Quine-Duhem thesis, which he persuasively argued is not Duhem’s, or with the famous ‘Quine-Duhem Thesis’ itself). The ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis’ consists of five sub-theses (some transcendental in nature, some other causal, factual, or descriptive), which are not independent, as they do not work separately (but only as a system) and do not relate to reality separately (but only simultaneously). The famous and disputed ‘continuity thesis’ is part, as a sub-thesis, from this larger argument. I argue that the ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis’ wraps up all of Duhem’s discoveries in the history of science and as a whole represents his main contribution to the historiography of science. The ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis’ is the central argument of Pierre Duhem's work as historian of science.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Logos & Episteme, 2015
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Studia Phaenomenologica, 2004
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Research Articles
Mihai HÎNCU, Predicates of Personal Taste and Faultless Disagreement
Erik KRAG... more Research Articles
Mihai HÎNCU, Predicates of Personal Taste and Faultless Disagreement
Erik KRAG, Coherentism and Belief Fixation
Horia-Roman PATAPIEVICI, The ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis.’ A Reappraisal of Duhem’s Discovery of the Physics of the Middle Ages
Discussion Notes/Debate
Juan COMESAÑA and Carolina SARTORIO, Easy Knowledge Makes No Difference: Reply to Wielenberg
Andrew NAYLOR, On Inferentially Remembering that p
Gregory STOUTENBURG, Cartesianism, Neo-Reidianism, and the A Priori: Reply to Pust
Daniel WHITING, Knowledge is Not Belief for Sufficient (Objective and Subjective) Reason
Reviews
Jaroslav Peregrin, Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, reviewed by Thomas Dabay
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Horia-Roman Patapievici
Mihai HÎNCU, Predicates of Personal Taste and Faultless Disagreement
Erik KRAG, Coherentism and Belief Fixation
Horia-Roman PATAPIEVICI, The ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis.’ A Reappraisal of Duhem’s Discovery of the Physics of the Middle Ages
Discussion Notes/Debate
Juan COMESAÑA and Carolina SARTORIO, Easy Knowledge Makes No Difference: Reply to Wielenberg
Andrew NAYLOR, On Inferentially Remembering that p
Gregory STOUTENBURG, Cartesianism, Neo-Reidianism, and the A Priori: Reply to Pust
Daniel WHITING, Knowledge is Not Belief for Sufficient (Objective and Subjective) Reason
Reviews
Jaroslav Peregrin, Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, reviewed by Thomas Dabay
Mihai HÎNCU, Predicates of Personal Taste and Faultless Disagreement
Erik KRAG, Coherentism and Belief Fixation
Horia-Roman PATAPIEVICI, The ‘Pierre Duhem Thesis.’ A Reappraisal of Duhem’s Discovery of the Physics of the Middle Ages
Discussion Notes/Debate
Juan COMESAÑA and Carolina SARTORIO, Easy Knowledge Makes No Difference: Reply to Wielenberg
Andrew NAYLOR, On Inferentially Remembering that p
Gregory STOUTENBURG, Cartesianism, Neo-Reidianism, and the A Priori: Reply to Pust
Daniel WHITING, Knowledge is Not Belief for Sufficient (Objective and Subjective) Reason
Reviews
Jaroslav Peregrin, Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, reviewed by Thomas Dabay