Purpose: the purpose of this study was to
compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative ma... more Purpose: the purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative materials at 24 hrs and 1 week. Materials and Methods: endodontic access cavities were prepared in 56 extracted lower incisor-teeth and divided into 5 groups (n=10). Standard 5 mm deep access preparations were completed and root canals were prepared to size ISO #30 file. the access cavities were restored as follows: Group 1: temporary restorative material (ceivitron); Group 2: glass ionomer cement (Fuji II); Group 3: zinc oxide-eugenol cement (IrM); Group 4: zinc phosphate cement (adhesor); Group 5: polytetrafluoroetylene tape (PtFe). the quality of the coronal sealing of each specimen was measured (24 hrs and 1 week) using fluid transport model. the data was analysed with repeated measurements of anoVa, Tukey, Paired samples T-Tests. Results: a significant difference was found among the groups at all time-periods (p<0.05). at 24 hrs, PtFe showed similar leakage with ceivitron, IrM, and Fuji II but it showed higher leakage than adhesor. at 1 week, ceivitron showed higher leakage than PtFe, meanwhile PtFe showed similar leakage with IrM, Fuji II, and adhesor (p>0.05). Sealing ability of IrM and PtFe groups significantly increased by time (p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, PtFe showed an acceptable short-term sealing capability when compared to the other commonly used temporary restorative materials at 1 week measurements.
Purpose: the purpose of this study was to
compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative ma... more Purpose: the purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative materials at 24 hrs and 1 week. Materials and Methods: endodontic access cavities were prepared in 56 extracted lower incisor-teeth and divided into 5 groups (n=10). Standard 5 mm deep access preparations were completed and root canals were prepared to size ISO #30 file. the access cavities were restored as follows: Group 1: temporary restorative material (ceivitron); Group 2: glass ionomer cement (Fuji II); Group 3: zinc oxide-eugenol cement (IrM); Group 4: zinc phosphate cement (adhesor); Group 5: polytetrafluoroetylene tape (PtFe). the quality of the coronal sealing of each specimen was measured (24 hrs and 1 week) using fluid transport model. the data was analysed with repeated measurements of anoVa, Tukey, Paired samples T-Tests. Results: a significant difference was found among the groups at all time-periods (p<0.05). at 24 hrs, PtFe showed similar leakage with ceivitron, IrM, and Fuji II but it showed higher leakage than adhesor. at 1 week, ceivitron showed higher leakage than PtFe, meanwhile PtFe showed similar leakage with IrM, Fuji II, and adhesor (p>0.05). Sealing ability of IrM and PtFe groups significantly increased by time (p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, PtFe showed an acceptable short-term sealing capability when compared to the other commonly used temporary restorative materials at 1 week measurements.
Uploads
Papers by Keziban Çelİk
compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative materials at 24 hrs and 1 week. Materials and Methods: endodontic access cavities were prepared in 56 extracted lower incisor-teeth and divided into 5 groups (n=10). Standard 5 mm deep access preparations were completed and root canals were prepared to size ISO #30 file. the access cavities were restored as follows: Group 1: temporary restorative material (ceivitron); Group 2: glass ionomer cement (Fuji II); Group 3: zinc oxide-eugenol cement (IrM); Group 4: zinc phosphate cement (adhesor); Group 5: polytetrafluoroetylene tape (PtFe). the quality of the coronal sealing of each specimen was measured (24 hrs and 1 week) using fluid transport model. the data was analysed with repeated measurements of anoVa, Tukey, Paired samples T-Tests. Results: a significant difference was found among the groups at all time-periods (p<0.05). at 24 hrs, PtFe showed similar leakage with ceivitron, IrM, and Fuji II but it showed higher leakage than adhesor. at 1 week, ceivitron showed higher leakage than PtFe, meanwhile PtFe showed similar leakage with IrM, Fuji II, and adhesor (p>0.05). Sealing ability of IrM and PtFe groups significantly increased by time (p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, PtFe showed an acceptable short-term sealing capability when compared to the other commonly used temporary restorative materials at 1 week measurements.
compare the sealing ability of temporary restorative materials at 24 hrs and 1 week. Materials and Methods: endodontic access cavities were prepared in 56 extracted lower incisor-teeth and divided into 5 groups (n=10). Standard 5 mm deep access preparations were completed and root canals were prepared to size ISO #30 file. the access cavities were restored as follows: Group 1: temporary restorative material (ceivitron); Group 2: glass ionomer cement (Fuji II); Group 3: zinc oxide-eugenol cement (IrM); Group 4: zinc phosphate cement (adhesor); Group 5: polytetrafluoroetylene tape (PtFe). the quality of the coronal sealing of each specimen was measured (24 hrs and 1 week) using fluid transport model. the data was analysed with repeated measurements of anoVa, Tukey, Paired samples T-Tests. Results: a significant difference was found among the groups at all time-periods (p<0.05). at 24 hrs, PtFe showed similar leakage with ceivitron, IrM, and Fuji II but it showed higher leakage than adhesor. at 1 week, ceivitron showed higher leakage than PtFe, meanwhile PtFe showed similar leakage with IrM, Fuji II, and adhesor (p>0.05). Sealing ability of IrM and PtFe groups significantly increased by time (p<0.05 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, PtFe showed an acceptable short-term sealing capability when compared to the other commonly used temporary restorative materials at 1 week measurements.