
Lawson Bush, V
Related Authors
Ernest Morrell
University of Notre Dame
Oludamini Ogunnaike
University of Virginia
Chammah J Kaunda
Yonsei University
LaGarrett King
University of Missouri Columbia
Jarvis Givens
Harvard University
Michael Jennings
Furman University
Ashley N Woodson
University of Pittsburgh
Toya Jones Frank
George Mason University
Anthony L. Brown
The University of Texas at Austin
Uploads
Papers by Lawson Bush, V
nondeficit frameworks, practices, and thinking represent a paradigm shift from the pervasive deficit model. These recent conceptual pushes, although a move in the right direction, are still deficient, and we argue
that both deficit and nondeficit models, as currently positioned, are problematic. Based on our argument, we offer the following four recommendations for scholars: (a) define success when writing about successful African American boys and men; (b) refrain from using reactionary and deficit words, such as counter; (c) couple Critical Race Theory (CRT) with other frameworks; and (d) create frameworks and theories to communicate the position and trajectory of African American boys and men in the world.
nondeficit frameworks, practices, and thinking represent a paradigm shift from the pervasive deficit model. These recent conceptual pushes, although a move in the right direction, are still deficient, and we argue
that both deficit and nondeficit models, as currently positioned, are problematic. Based on our argument, we offer the following four recommendations for scholars: (a) define success when writing about successful African American boys and men; (b) refrain from using reactionary and deficit words, such as counter; (c) couple Critical Race Theory (CRT) with other frameworks; and (d) create frameworks and theories to communicate the position and trajectory of African American boys and men in the world.