Papers by Nikolaos Vardakis
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015
e19044 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients ... more e19044 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, third generation non-platinum combination...
Annals of Oncology, 2019
Background In humans Tregs lack a unique phenotypic marker and Foxp3 expression in cluster of dif... more Background In humans Tregs lack a unique phenotypic marker and Foxp3 expression in cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25high T lymphocytes is commonly used for their characterization. In early colorectal cancer, the presence of Tregs in CRC tumour tissue has been associated with favourable prognosis. However, the prognostic role of circulating Tregs in CRC patients and especially in the metastatic setting is not yet clear. Methods We collected peripheral blood from 57 patients with mCRC before initiation of first line chemotherapy. Samples were analysed with multicolour flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against CD3, CD4, CD25, and FoxP3. The ratio of FoxP3 positive cells within the CD3+CD4+CD25high lymphocytic subpopulation (F/H ratio) was measured and quartile analysis according to this ratio was carried out. Overall survival was calculated from initiation of first line chemotherapy to death or last follow up. Median OS (mOS) was compared between the highest ...
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2019
5562 Background: The standard of care for Epithelial Ovarian cancer (EOC) is the combination of a... more 5562 Background: The standard of care for Epithelial Ovarian cancer (EOC) is the combination of a taxane plus a platinum compound (TC) whereas the addition of bevacizumab (bev) to this regimen (TC-bev) has been shown to improve the PFS. Patients (pts) with ascites have more aggressive disease and less overall survival. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of the TC/bev regimen in the real life clinical practice. Methods: A multi-center observational study, approved by the ethics committees of the participating centers, including 314 pts with stage III/IV EOC, was conducted (11.2011-06.2014) in Greece. Two independent cohorts, with similar clinico-pathologic characteristics, were treated with front-line TC (n = 109) or TC/bev (n = 205) according to the physician’s choice. 83 (40.5%) and 40 (36.7%) in the TC/bev and TC groups presented with ascites. Results: Disease control was achieved in 90.7% and in 78.9% of patients treated with TC/bev and TC, respectively (p = 0.003). ...
Minerva Ginecologica, 2019
BACKGROUND Evaluation of safety of the weekly intravenous gemcitabine/topotecan combination as sa... more BACKGROUND Evaluation of safety of the weekly intravenous gemcitabine/topotecan combination as salvage treatment in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Twenty-four women with histologically-proven relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC) were enrolled in the study. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2 IV) along with escalated doses of gemcitabine (starting dose 700 mg/m2 with increments of 100 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity of the combination were evaluated at the first cycle. RESULTS Twenty-four ROC patients were enrolled in six dose-levels. Most patients had high-grade serous metastatic ovarian cancer (41.7%) and performance status score of 0-1 (95.8%). For 12 patients (50%) treatment was 2nd line and for 12 >2nd line. Eighty-eight cycles were administered with a median of three cycles per patient. The MTD was not reached and grade 3-4 (3.4% and 2.3% of cycles, respectively) neutropenia and grade 4 (3.4% of cycles) thrombocytopenia were the main adverse events. There was no case of febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild with grade 2 fatigue being the most frequent complain. The recommended MTD doses of the combination were topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Two complete (8.3%) and three (12.5%) partial responses were achieved (ORR: 20.8%). CONCLUSIONS The weekly administration of gemcitabine/topotecan regimen in patients with pretreated metastatic ovarian cancer is an active chemotherapy combination, even in heavily pretreated patients, with a manageable toxicity profile which merits further investigation.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2011
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs); the do... more Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs); the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs); the possible pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions; and to evaluate the clinical activity of the imatinib plus irinotecan combination in pre-treated patients with extensive stage SCLC. Patients & Methods: Patients with refractory/relapsed SCLC were eligible. During the phase I part of the study, escalated doses of imatinib were administered daily in combination with irinotecan every 14 days. DLT and pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs were determined during the first treatment cycle. During the phase II part of the study, the determined MTDs of the drugs were used to treat eligible patients. Results: During the phase I part of the study (n=11 patients), the MTDs for imatinib and irinotecan were defined at 400mg/day and 150mg/m2 every 2 weeks, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia and treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia were the DLTs. PK analysis for ima...
Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology
Continuous administration of oral vinorelbine, given 3 times a week (metronomic), is feasible and... more Continuous administration of oral vinorelbine, given 3 times a week (metronomic), is feasible and exceptionally well tolerated at doses up to 50 mg with clinical activity against refractory tumors. In this phase II study oral metronomic vinorelbine and bevacizumab were evaluated as salvage therapy in women with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients received oral vinorelbine (50 mg 3 times a week) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) biweekly in cycles of 28 days. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). A preplanned analysis was performed when the first 13 patients were evaluated for tumor response. One patient (7.7%) achieved partial response (PR) and 6 (46.1%) stable disease (SD). The combination was very well tolerated but, as per protocol, the study was closed prematurely due to lack of efficacy. The combination of oral metronomic vinorelbine and bevacizumab has good tolerance but minimal activity in terms of objective responses in pretreated patients with MBC.
Anticancer research
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and activity of a gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combin... more The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and activity of a gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination (GEMOX) regimen in pretreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Twenty-seven platinum-refractory/resistant and 14 platinum-sensitive patients received gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 intravenously in days 1+8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in day 8 every 21 days. Ten responses (one complete, nine partial) were observed; five in platinum-sensitive and five in platinum-resistant tumors. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 17 and 10 patients, respectively. There were two treatment-related deaths due to thrombocytopenia and non-neutropenic sepsis. The GEMOX regimen has moderate activity in both platinum-sensitive and resistant ovarian cancer and a toxicity profile that can be significant and therefore requires careful monitoring.
Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology
To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of weekly... more To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of weekly high dose 5-fluorouracil (5FU) continuous infusion and leukovorin (LV) alternatively combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Patients received a fixed dose of LV (500 mg/m(2)) over 2 h infusion on weeks 1 to 4 and escalated doses of: oxaliplatin (starting dose 65 mg/m(2): 120 min i.v. infusion on weeks 1 and 3); irinotecan (starting dose 80 mg/m(2); 90 min i.v. infusion on weeks 2 and 4) and 5FU (starting dose 1500 mg/m(2); 22 h continuous i.v. infusion, on weeks 1 to 4), in cycles of 5 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the fi rst cycle. Twenty-eight patients were treated on 8 dose levels and all but two patients received the regimen at least as second-line treatment. The DLT level was reached at the oxaliplatin dose of 90 mg/m(2), irinotecan dose of 110 mg/m(2), LV dose of 500 mg/m(2) and 5FU dose of 1750 mg/m(2); th...
Anticancer research
To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vinorelbine... more To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vinorelbine (VNR) with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (CPM) and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Eighteen patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled. VNR was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1 at escalated doses with CPM 300 mg/m2 i.v. bolus and LV 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour i.v. infusion, followed by 5-FU 1500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour continuous infusion (c.i.) for two consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. At the dose of VNR 22.5 mg/m2 without rhG-CSF and 25 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support, the DLT had been reached. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in six (33%) patients and in fourteen (27%) cycles with no episode of febrile neutropenia. One (5.5%) patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 neurotoxicity occurred in two patients an...
Anticancer research
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line tr... more To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line treatment of patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, age < 75 years, performance status (WHO) 0-2, were enrolled onto the study. Docetaxel was given at a dose of 100 mg/m2 over an 1-hour i.v. infusion. Carboplatin dosed to an area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) of 6 mg/ml.minute, using the Calvert's formula, was administered over a 30-minute i.v. infusion. The regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. Thirty-eight patients received a total of 155 chemotherapy cycles (median 4 cycles/patient). All patients were assessable for toxicity and 34 for response. There was one (2.6%) complete and nine (23.7%) partial responses; in an intention-to-treat analysis the overall response rate was 26.6% (95% CI: 12.3%-40.3%). The median duration of response was 7 months (range: 3-29), ...
Clinical Lung Cancer, 2011
European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 2009
Clinical Lung Cancer, 2012
Clinical Lung Cancer, 2011
This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of the paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) doublet versus ... more This study evaluates the activity and toxicity of the paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) doublet versus vinorelbine/carboplatin (VC) doublet as second-line treatment in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients pretreated with front-line docetaxel and gemcitabine were randomized to receive either PC (n = 75), which consisted of paclitaxel at a dose of 140 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC3), or VC (n = 78), which consisted of vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) orally and carboplatin AUC3; both drugs were administered on days 1 and 15. The overall response rate was 18.6% (95% confidence interval, 9.85%-27.49%; one complete and 13 partial responses) in the PC arm and 7.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.78%-13.61%; one complete and five partial responses) in the VC arm (P = .056). Median time to tumor progression was 3.5 months (range, 0.3 - 23.73 months) and 3.07 months (range, 0.37-18.5) in the PC and VC arm, respectively (P = .287). Median overall survival was 7.83 months (range, 0.3-45.03 months) and 7.60 months (range, 0.5-30.27 months) for PC and VC arms, respectively (P value = .633). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated and grade III/IV toxicities were relatively infrequent. No toxic deaths were observed. Platinum-based doublets with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC pretreated with front-line docetaxel/gemcitabine show comparable efficacy when used in the second-line setting.
Oncology, 2002
Vinorelbine (V) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tum... more Vinorelbine (V) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. Thirty-eight patients with histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer who had failed at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. The patients&#39; median age was 60 years, 33 were female, and 27 had a performance status (WHO) of 0-1. V was administered on days 1 and 8 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion at escalated doses ranging from 20 to 27 mg/m2. OX was administered on days 1 and 8 at escalated doses ranging from 40 to 55 mg/m2, following V administration. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. At the dose of V 27 mg/m2 and OX 55 mg/m2 3 out of 6 enrolled patients presented DLTs (2 patients grade 4 neutropenia and 1 treatment delay at day 8), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are V 27 mg/m2 and OX 50 mg/m2. A total of 131 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia complicated 23 (18%) treatment cycles. There was one septic death. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (17 cycles; 13%), grade 2 neurotoxicity (6 cycles; 5%) and grade 2/3 asthenia (21 cycles; 16%). One CR (4%), 5 PR (20%) and 4 SD (16%) were observed amongst the 25 evaluable patients. All responses were observed in patients with ovarian and breast cancer. The results of this phase I study demonstrate that V and OX can be combined at clinically effective and relevant doses to be further evaluated in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.
Oncology, 2007
The study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and identify the dose-limiting to... more The study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and identify the dose-limiting toxicities of the biweekly administration of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors. Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalated doses of gemcitabine and pemetrexed (starting doses 1,250 and 300 mg/m(2), respectively) both given on days 1 and 15 in cycles of 4 weeks. Forty-one patients were treated at 7 dose levels. The MTD was reached at the dose of 1,750 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and 450 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed. Dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and treatment delay due to grade III hematological toxicities. One partial response in a pretreated patient with ovarian cancer was observed, while 4 other patients experienced stable disease. The biweekly administration of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed at the recommended MTDs is safe, well tolerated and demonstrates antitumor activity which merits further evaluation in phase II studies.
Oncology, 2004
To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan and gemcitabine in pretreated ... more To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan and gemcitabine in pretreated patients having small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-one patients (median age 60 years, performance status 0-1 in 87% and 2 in 13% of the patients) with limited or extensive-stage disease, refractory or relapsing after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen, received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 21 days. Sixteen (52%) patients had sensitive and 15 (48%) refractory disease. Fifteen patients (48%) had received &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; or =2 prior regimens. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 26 for response analysis. A median of three (range 1-6) cycles per patient was administered. Three partial responses were documented for an overall response rate of 10% (95% CI 0.73-20.09), and disease stabilization was obtained in 7 patients (22%; intention-to-treat analysis). Two of the responders had refractory, and 1 had sensitive disease. The median time to progression was 4.5 months, the median duration of responses was 2.5 months, and the median survival time was 6 months. Grade 3-4 (WHO) neutropenia was observed in 9 patients (29%), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 4 (13%), and grade 3-4 diahrrea in 3 patients (10%). Three patients experienced febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. The combination showed modest activity in this patient group with a poor prognosis. Thus we believe it merits further investigation in the treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer who have failed one prior chemotherapy regimen.
Oncology, 2007
To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated doses of the paclitaxe... more To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated doses of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin (LOHP) and capecitabine combination in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel (starting dose 100 mg/m2) and LOHP (starting dose 40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and capecitabine (starting dose 800 mg/m2/day) on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 28 days. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle. Sixteen patients were treated at four dose-escalating levels. Eleven (68.7%) patients had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. The DLT level was reached at paclitaxel 110 mg/m2, LOHP 50 mg/m2 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2/day. DLTs due to grade 2-3 neutropenia resulted in treatment delays. No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death occurred. Grade 2-3 neutropenia occurred in 3 (19%) patients each, grade 2-4 fatigue affected 6 (37.5%) patients, and grade 2-3 neurotoxicity was observed in 2 (12.5%) and 1 (6%) patients, respectively. Two partial responses and four disease stabilizations were achieved. The recommended doses for phase II studies are paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and LOHP 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2/day on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 4 weeks. This regimen is well tolerated and merits further evaluation.
Oncology, 2007
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and capecitabine (CAP) have separately shown significant an... more Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and capecitabine (CAP) have separately shown significant antitumor activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. Fifteen patients with histologically confirmed inoperable solid neoplasms were enrolled. The patients&#39; median age was 65 years, 10 were male, and 12 had a performance status score (WHO) of 0-1. PLD was administered on day 1 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion at escalated doses ranging from 35 to 40 mg/m(2). CAP was administered on days 1-14 per os, at escalated doses ranging from 1,600 to 1,800 mg/m(2), given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. At the dose of PLD 40 mg/m(2) and CAP 1,800 mg/m(2), all 3 enrolled patients presented DLTs [2 patients grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) and 1 patient grade 3 asthenia] and thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies is PLD 40 mg/m(2) and CAP 1,700 mg/m(2). A total of 57 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 2/3 neutropenia complicated 9 (17%) cycles and 1 patient was hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. There was no septic death. The main nonhematologic toxicity was PPE grade 2 in 3 (19%) patients and grade 3 in 4 (27%). PPE was the reason of treatment interruption for 3 patients. Other toxicities were mild and easily manageable. Two patients (16%) with partial response suffering from gastric cancer and 5 patients with (42%) stable disease were observed among 12 evaluable patients. The results of this phase I study demonstrate that PLD and CAP can be combined at clinically effective and relevant doses. However, PPE is a common side effect and further investigation is warranted to define its precise role in the treatment of solid malignancies.
Uploads
Papers by Nikolaos Vardakis