Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2014
Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory go... more Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalising the housing market and countering the concentration of low-income groups. This paper discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using Amsterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighbourhoods already prone to gentrification.
Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory go... more Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalising the housing market and countering the concentration of low-income groups. This paper discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using Amsterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighbourhoods already prone to gentrification.
Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory go... more Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalizing the housing market and countering the concentration of low-income groups. This article discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using Amsterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighborhoods already prone to gentrification.
Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2014
Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory go... more Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalising the housing market and countering the concentration of low-income groups. This paper discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using Amsterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighbourhoods already prone to gentrification.
Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory go... more Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalising the housing market and countering the concentration of low-income groups. This paper discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using Amsterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighbourhoods already prone to gentrification.
Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory go... more Like many other governments, the Dutch government has simultaneously pursued the contradictory goals of liberalizing the housing market and countering the concentration of low-income groups. This article discusses how the tension between promoting market forces and countering segregation has played out, using Amsterdam as a case study. The findings suggest that the policy may have mitigated but did not prevent a deepening division between the city's increasingly privileged core and its periphery. This is at least in part because social mixing was pursued also in neighborhoods already prone to gentrification.
Uploads
Papers by Tjerk Bosker