Swiss immigration referendum, February 2014
Federal popular initiative "against mass immigration" |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The federal popular initiative "against mass immigration" (German: Eidgenössische Volksinitiative "Gegen Masseneinwanderung", French: Initiative populaire « Contre l'immigration de masse », Italian: Iniziativa popolare "Contro l'immigrazione di massa" ) is a Swiss federal popular initiative. It aims to limit immigration through quotas,[2] as it had been before the bilateral treaties between Switzerland and the European Union.
The proposal was launched by the national conservative Swiss People's Party and was accepted by a majority of the electorate (50.3%, a difference of 19,526 votes) and a majority of the cantons (14.5 out of 23; 12 of 20 full cantons plus five of six half cantons) on 9 February 2014. This initiative was mostly backed by rural (57.6% approvals), suburban (51.2% approvals), and isolated cities (51.3% approvals) of Switzerland as well as by a strong majority (69.2% approvals) in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino, while metropolitan centers (58.5% rejection) and the French-speaking part (58.5% rejection) of Switzerland rejected it.[1]
Contents
Context
As of 2014, 23.4% of Switzerland's population are foreigners (Germany: 9%). The net immigration is 80,000 people per year, 1% of the total population (three times more than e.g. in Germany, four times more than in the U.S.). Every year 30,000 – 40,000 receive Swiss nationality (this represents a per capita rate of about three times that of both Germany and the United States).[3][4][5][6] According to the European Commission about 1 million EU citizens live in Switzerland and another 230,000 cross the border daily for work, while 430,000 Swiss live in the EU.[7]
Immigrant workers make up a large part of the Swiss workforce in several industries. Scienceindustries, the Swiss association of chemical, pharma, and biotech businesses, emphasized that they rely on highly qualified workers from outside Switzerland to keep an edge over their competitors, and that 45% out of 67,000 people that its member companies employ in Switzerland are from abroad.[8]
In 2002, the Swiss People's Party launched a federal popular initiative "against asylum abuse" that was rejected by 50.1% of voters (with a difference of 4,208 votes).[9] In 2009, the referendum on biometric passports required by the Schengen Agreement was also accepted by 50.1% of voters (with a difference of 5,680 votes).[9]
More recently, the Swiss People's Party had successfully launched federal popular initiatives "against the construction of minarets" (2009, 57.5%) and "for the expulsion of criminal foreigners" (2010, 52.3%).
Some news commentators claim that the federal popular initiative "against mass immigration" contravenes bilateral treaties between Switzerland and the European Union that guarantee the free movement of persons introduced in 2007 following a referendum in 2000.[10]
Results
Category | Absolute number | Proportion of total | Proportion of received | Proportion of valid and blank | Proportion of valid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Voters | 5,211,426 | 100 % | - | - | - |
Ballot papers received | 2,948,156 | 56.57% | 100% | - | - |
Null and void ballots | 8,656 | 0.17% | 0.29% | - | - |
Blank votes | 31,094 | 0.60% | 1.05% | 1.06% | - |
Valid votes | 2,908,406 | 55.81% (yes and no) | 98.65% (yes and no) | 98.94% (yes and no) | 100% |
Yes | 1,463,854 | 28.09% | 49.65% | 49.80% | 50.33% |
No | 1,444,552 | 27.72% | 49.00% | 49.14% | 49.67% |
Reception
National reactions
After the acceptance of the federal popular initiative "against mass immigration", views varied widely as to why the initiative was successful at the polls, and how it might actually be implemented.[12] To some observers, the situation was reminiscent of the referendum held on 6 December 1992, when 50.3% of the Swiss people voted against joining the European Economic Area.[13]
The Swiss People's Party, which was the main proponent of the initiative, celebrated the referendum outcome as a major victory. The party's head Toni Brunner stated: "This is a sea change in Switzerland's migration policy. It is clear that immigration will have to be massively restricted."[14]
Luzi Stamm, the VP of the SVP, praised the outcome of the referendum, saying that Switzerland should "have the right to control [its own immigration]," and indicated that radical right-wing parties in the rest of Europe would enjoy similar victories because of the mistakes of the "[European] politicians."[15]
Some commentators fear a slowdown in economic activity due to the enforcement of the initiative. Business and industry groups were opposed to the initiative during the campaign and expressed concern about the measure's impact on their ability to attract and retain top talent from abroad.[16] The Swiss Bankers Association expressed disappointment and concern at the result, saying: "We urgently need to hold constructive talks with the EU to explain our position".[17]
Although all governing parties except the Swiss People's Party opposed the initiative, the federal council (the Swiss government) announced that it would promptly start implementing the new constitutional provisions and will set to work on re-introducing immigration quotas "without delay".[18] The acceptance of the initiative binds the Swiss government to renegotiate the entire EU labor market agreements with the EU within three years; the current treaties stay in force in the meantime.[19]
European Union reactions
The European Commission issued a statement saying that it was "disappointed" in the Swiss referendum on immigration restriction result but would wait to study how exactly the outcome of the referendum affects the relations between Switzerland and the European Union.[20] European Commission vice-president Viviane Reding stated that the result of the referendum could jeopardise Switzerland's access to the European single market, saying "The single market is not Swiss cheese."[21]
Consequences
Within the first week after the vote, the consequences were unclear. There were warnings in the hours after the initiative passed that multiple new treaties still under discussion and new and existing collaborations between Switzerland and the European Union might be endangered:[22]
- electricity agreement, Directive 2009/72/EC
- Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals
- participation in education programs (e.g. Lifelong Learning Programme 2007–2013)
- participation in research programs (e.g. Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development)
Discussions are ongoing as to how policy and practices can be designed in accordance with both Swiss and EU law. Representations have been made that the free movement of persons is not sacrosanct. Liechtenstein, over 30% of whose residents and over 50% of whose employed are foreigners, has a legal provision that it can restrict immigration. When the EU started the negotiations with Turkey, it explicitly did not include the free movement of people.[23]
Education and research
In a statement to HINA, EU Commission spokesperson Joe Hennon said that the vote would influence the next round of talks for Swiss inclusion in Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+. The talks were about programmes which can be applied for in 2014. For the acacemic year 2011/2012, 2,612 Swiss students went abroad, at the same time 2,673 foreign students came to Switzerland with the Erasmus program.[8][24] Under the Seventh Framework Programme, the predecessor to Horizon 2020, more than one in four Swiss research proposals were funded in a total of 3,000 projects, which was the fourth highest success rate on average. Swiss researchers secured €1.27 billion in EU funding between 2007-2012, including about €356 million in coveted basic research grants from the European Research Council.[8] According to the "Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013" Switzerland was the overall innovation leader before Sweden, Germany, Denmark and Finland. It continuously outperformed the EU27 countries.[25][26] By 26 February 2014, the EU announced that, at least for 2014, Switzerland's status in Horizon2020 would be downgraded from an associated to third country and that Swiss based scientists could not apply for ERC grants.[27]
The referendum will not impact CERNs recruitment as it is an international organisation and does not need Swiss work permits.[8]
Croatia
Following the referendum the federal council was no longer allowed to sign the already negotiated free movement accord with Croatia, which joined the EU in July 2013. The new Swiss constitution article is immediately binding for the federal council, which now is looking for a way to not discriminate against Croatia. The European Commission connects the negotiations for 2014 Erasmus program and the signing of the free movement accord for Croatia.[28][29][30] On March 4, 2016, Switzerland and the EU signed a treaty that would extend the accord of the free movement of people to Croatia, something which is expected to lead to Switzerland's full readmission into Horizon 2020.[31][32]
See also
- Ecopop
- Demographics of Switzerland
- Freedom of movement for workers
- Immigration to Switzerland
- Politics of Switzerland
- Swiss referendums, 2014
- Switzerland–European Union relations
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ (French) Initiative populaire fédérale « contre l'immigration de masse », admin.ch (page visited on 9 February 2014).
- ↑ Acquisition of Swiss citizenship, last 5 years, Swiss Federal Statistics Office. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- ↑ Einbürgerungen von Ausländern gesamt und nach Geschlecht, 2000–2012
- ↑ Schweizer gegen Zuwanderung: Europas mutigste Demokraten, Der Spiegel, 11 February 2014.
- ↑ Naturalization Fact Sheet, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2012-10-24.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 (French) "Un résultat plus serré qu'en 1992 pour l'EEE", Le Temps, p. 4, Monday 10 February 2014.
- ↑ "Swiss immigration: 50.3% back quotas, final results show", BBC News, 9 February 2014 (page visited on 10 February 2014).
- ↑ (French) Tableau récapitulatif de la votation numéro 580 du 9 février 2014, Federal Chancellery of Switzerland (page visited on 14 February 2015).
- ↑ “Comments on Feb 9 Immigration Initiative: A sampling of excerpted reactions and analyses,” Migration as a travel business
- ↑ (French) Un nouveau dimanche noir, www.letemps.ch, 9 February 2014 (page visited on 9 February 2014).
- ↑ "Swiss voters narrowly back referendum curbing immigration", Deutsche Welle, 9 February 2014 (page visited on 10 February 2014).
- ↑ Mistakes of Brussels breed radicals across Europe - Luzi Stamm, Swiss' People's Party VP RT, 24 February 2014. Retrieved 27 March 2014
- ↑ Swiss Vote to Curb Immigration in Referendum, Bloomberg L.P., 9 February 2014 (page visited on 9 February 2014).
- ↑ "Swiss voters back limit on immigration", The Washington Post, 9 February 2014 (page visited on 9 February 2014).
- ↑ "Swiss agree to curb immigration and rethink EU deal", Swissinfo.ch, 9 February 2014 (page visited on 9 February 2014).
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Swiss Voters Narrowly Approve Curbs on Immigration, The New York Times, 9 February 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
- ↑ Swiss access to EU market under threat after immigration vote, Financial Times, 9 February 2014 (page visited on 12 February 2014).
- ↑ «Ich sehe ein weiteres Abkommen gefährdet», Tages Anzeiger, 11 February 2014.
- ↑ Die liechtensteinische Lösung – ein Vorbild für die Schweiz?, Tages Anzeiger, 11 February 2014.
- ↑ Erasmus ade?, 2014-02-11.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013, European Commission.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Vorerst kein freier Personenverkehr mit Kroatien, SRF, 2014-02-16.
- ↑ «Horizon 2020» auf Eis gelegt, NZZ, 2014-02-16.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Articles with French-language external links
- Use dmy dates from February 2014
- Use British English from February 2014
- Pages with broken file links
- Articles containing German-language text
- Articles containing French-language text
- Articles containing Italian-language text
- Lang and lang-xx using deprecated ISO 639 codes
- 2014 referendums
- Popular initiatives (Switzerland)
- Immigration law
- Immigration to Switzerland
- Referendums in Switzerland
- Switzerland–European Union relations