"App"의 정의와 사용법 및 예문에 관한 질문

A: The second sentence should be "I can’t use it properly."

A: I don’t use this app very often.

A: “boiling” doesn’t seem to make sense here. it could’ve been a typo and they meant to say “billing”. In this sense they are referring to payment.

A: It's like "goodbye" I think.

A: 나는 오랫동안 이 프로그램에 없었어요. 변화가 많이 있어요

A: I downloaded the app yesterday, and it doesn’t seem to work // She’s working on an app to help people organize their schedules // Have you heard of that app that scammed over a thousand people?

A: where r u

A: how are you ?

A: niib

A: You ask a question about English.
An English-speaker will answer it.

People learning Vietnamese ask questions.
You can answer them.

A: "I study English on this app" - Natural and correct.
"I study English by this app" - Unnatural and incorrect.

A: We use the simple ver after do/don't /did/didn't. The correct sentence would be "I don't have the app open".

A: They both have the same meaning. “I’ve only just started this app” uses more emphasis because you said you JUST started.

I hope this helps.

A: Upgrade: when you move from lower tier to an upper tier. Like moving from version 1 to the fundamentally different version 2.

“I upgraded from Windows XP to Windows 10”.
“I upgraded from the free version to the paid version of the app”.
“Google no longer supports android Oreo and you have to upgrade to android Pie”.

Update: when you move your current application to its latest version, just adding more functions, features and fixes. Like moving from version 1 to the fundamentally similar but more enhanced version 1.1

“I updated Windows XP to the latest service pack”
“I don’t want to upgrade to the paid version of the app. The free version with the latest updates is enough for me”.
“You have to update android Pie to the latest version for security reasons”.

A: They are both correct, but the meaning is slightly different.

"Not yet installed" implies that the app will be installed at some point.

"Not already installed" implies that maybe it should have already been installed.

A: Do you have Instagram on your phone?

B: No, the app is not yet installed.

A: Really? It's not already installed? I thought it came with the phone?"

A: あ、なるほど。ならば、「Other than posting questions about things which I don't know, I'm taking advantage by looking at other Japanese's questions that have been posted and trying to answer them in my head. After that, to see if I got it correct, I'm checking the English speaker's answers. 」の方が良いと思います。

A: I take English lessons with a Filipino tutor 20 minutes a day on a tutoring app. The main advantage is that I can assess it at a time that's convenient for me and select any tutor (or choose my tutor).

A: @Angellllllllllll

A: I believe its Gacha, the romanji is used and is similarly pronounced.

A: You said it right, but I think it would sound better if you said, “This app is pretty new to me”

A: Yes

A: It isn’t wrong, but it would sound better if you said just said “Why did this app crash?”

A: 1) The grammar is almost perfect. It should be "If creating an app were easy anyone could create one.

2) No. If I understand your question correctly, you can't use the verb that way. It's hard to give a definite explanation without a full example sentence, but with what you provided, it would have to be either:

If buying is a luxury...

OR

To buy is a luxury...

There could be a different explanation depending on the end of the sentence. (Yay English)

A: In English language, the information that comes at the end is the most important or the most excepted (what one expects to know ; it's the new information).
In English, "adjective" comes before "noun". When the order is switched, one expects the "adjective" to be more important / new information to the receiver.
This is typified in the tile of John Milton's poem "paradise lost". This should originally be "lost paradise", but the poet chooses to place "lost" after "paradise" to stress the loss of the paradise. If he leaves it in its original structure "lost paradise", it won't have the same intended impact like the one in " paradise lost". "lost" in "lost paradise" is just describing "paradise" while "lost" in "paradise lost" does not just describe but convey a sense of emphasis : the paradise is LOST!

By the same token, "invited friends" does not possess this sense of emphasis. In "no friends invited" you're emphasizing that no friends should be invited. That's why you can see (!); it shows emphasis. And for that reason, "no friends invited" is the preferred and the better structure in this context.
Good question!

A:

No

I will show you how to use this app
OR
I’m going to show you how to use this app