Natasa Jermen
Nataša Jermen graduated in molecular biology (1994) and gained her MSc in biomedicine (2003) at the Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb. In 2012 she was awarded the PhD degree in information and communication sciences at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb. She also graduated in Swedish language and literature at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in 1995. In 1994 she attended a scholarship at Valla Folkhögskola in Linköping for the advancement of her Swedish language knowledge. As a fellow at the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bologna, in 1996 she gained a specialisation in the field of biotechnology. In 1997 she trained in the field of molecular microbiology, as a fellow at the Institute of Microbiology, Karl-Franzens-University in Graz. Since 1998 she has been employed at the Miroslav Krleža Institute of Lexicography in Zagreb, as a member of the editorial board of the Croatian Encyclopaedia. She is a lexicographer in the field of natural sciences, biomedicine and biotechnology. From 2009 to 2013 she was the assistant director for research and development and since 2014 she has been the assistant director for research and inter-institutional co-operation. In this role, she coordinates and organises the Institute's activities related to its scientific performance. In 2016 she attended ERA Fellowship Programme at the Berlin Social Science Centre (WZB), which was launched by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research with the intention to support capacity building in the field of science management in the EU13. Her scientific interests lie within the field of information and communication sciences with the particular emphasis on the research of the impact of science polices on social sciences and humanities, as well as encyclopedistics in the digital humanities area. She was a collaborator in the project "The Development of a Model for the Evaluation of Scientific Work in Croatia", carried out at the Institute for Social Research in Zagreb (2007−2013) and funded by the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sport. Since 2017 she is a collaborator in the national project "Znameniti.hr", which aims at building a thematic portal containing digital material on famous Croatian personalities. She was a collaborator on the international project "Cooperation Framework of Digital Infrastructure in the Region − Opportunities and Needs in the Case of Material Concerning Famous People in Science and Culture" funded by DARIAH-EU consortium (2017−2018). She was a member of the COST Action "European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities" (ENRESSH) 2018−2020. Since 2015 she has been a member of the editorial board of the scientific journal Studia lexicographica; since 2022 she has been journal's deputy editor-in-chief. She is a member of the Croatian Biological Society (since 1994), International Committee for the History of Technology (ICOHTEC, since 2016), EvalHum Initiative (since 2019) − i.e. European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH, since 2022), Croatian Association for Scholarly Communication (CROASC, since 2020), and European Association of Science Editors (EASE, since 2021).
Phone: +385 1 4800 388
Address: Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleza, Frankopanska 26, 10000 Zagreb
Phone: +385 1 4800 388
Address: Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleza, Frankopanska 26, 10000 Zagreb
less
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Natasa Jermen
Institute’s publicly available repository of encyclopaedic knowledge enables the linking to the digital data and collections of other research and cultural institutions; therefore the collaborative projects aimed at reinforcing digital research and cultural infrastructure will be described.
Thanks to the properties of the digital media and increasing connectivity, a closer collaboration between professionally edited online encyclopaedias across Europe (and beyond) is enabled. This paper elaborates a range of initiatives seeking to build connections across individual European and North American national encyclopaedias, focusing on the role that Croatian encyclopaedistics plays in this endeavour.
from 1991 to 2005 was determined by analysing 8436 papers published in natural science journals, indexed
in the Wos-SCI-Expanded database for the given period. Thus we were able to gain insights into
the characteristics of scientific communications from Croatian scientific institutions, for example, their
productivity and influence, for the period that preceded the implementation of the current system
of evaluating scientific performance and the creation of national strategic documents that were designed
to provide guidelines for the development of science. Also, it was determined whether the legal
framework of evaluating scientific institutions and the strategies for the development of science were
based on the true state of scientific activity in the field of natural sciences. This research is the starting
point for further systemic scientometric research which would enable the monitoring of the observed
conditions and trends in the activity of Croatian scientific institutions.
The purpose of this research was to establish the features of scientific activity in the field of natural sciences in Croatia, using a bibliometric analysis of 8436 scientific papers with a Croatian address published in natural sciences journals indexed in WoS-SCI database from 1991 to 2005.
The first part of the dissertation (chapters 1, 2 and 3) defines the role of bibliometrics and scientometrics as well as the review process in evaluating scientific performance. The role of a journal as the main communication channel in natural sciences is described, and an overview of the most important secondary sources of information for the field of natural sciences is presented. The creators of scientific information as well as scientific cooperation are described. Scientific productivity and scientific impact are defined, as well as the indicators that determine them. Basic guidelines of science policy in Croatia are commented on. Strategies of science and education development are described. The legal status of science and the systems of evaluation of scientific performance are defined.
Since previous means of the assessment of scientific performance have not proven satisfactory in Croatia, in the goals of the research (chapter 4) it is stated that the aim of the research was to point out the need to define a new model of evaluation and stimulation of scientific work in the field of natural sciences.
The methodology of the research is described in chapter 5. It is stated that the research sample consisted of the papers published in natural sciences journals indexed in the WoS from 1991 to 2005, on which at least one author had a Croatian institutional address and that data on the citation of those papers was also retrieved from the WoS. The journal status was determined using its IF from the JCR Science Edition database for 2005. Journals represented in the Current Contents database were analysed.
Chapter 6 shows the results of the research and the discussion. Data retrieved with the analysis of the scientific activity using two indicators, scientific productivity and its scientific impact is shown and interpreted. Scientific productivity is shown by the number of papers in the WoS-SCI database in the observed 15-year period, and the scientific impact of those papers was determined with the citation analysis. As additional indicators, trends in co-authorship as well as international cooperation were determined. Besides the position of
scientific activity in the field of natural sciences as a whole, characteristics of scientific activity were determined for specific fields of natural sciences: biology, physics, geosciences, chemistry, mathematics and interdisciplinary field. The most productive fields of natural sciences for the observed period were chemistry (33.9% of all papers), physics (27.3% of all papers) and biology (24.9% of all papers). The highest impact of papers was observed in the field of physics (on average 10.7 citations per paper) and geosciences (on average 8.1 citations per paper), and the lowest in the field of mathematics (on average 2.6 citations per paper). The scientific activity of Croatian institutions whose addresses were indicated on the papers in the examined body of natural sciences journals was also analysed. The Ruđer Bošković Institute, Faculty of Science in Zagreb and the Institute of Physics were shown to be the centres of excellence. When it came to universities, the University of Zagreb and the University of Rijeka stood out.
Chapter 7 comments on the existing system of the assessment of scientific performance and points out its shortcomings, since that system is not adapted to the specificities of various scientific disciplines. Based on the specificity of scientific publishing in certain fields of natural sciences determined by this research, some of the guidelines for possible changes in the existing system of evaluating scientific performance are offered. Specifically, it is pointed out that scientific output of different fields and subfields of natural sciences should not be compared. Furthermore, using determined conditions and trends in scientific activity, possible directions of natural sciences development are defined, based on which Croatia could become recognisable in the international scientific environment.
The conclusion (chapter 8) points out that the results of the research could help institutions and bodies responsible for creating science policy devise more objective tools for the assessment of scientific performance in the field of natural sciences and in planning the development of natural sciences. Systematic bibliometric and scientometric research could influence an improvement of the scientific status of Croatia in the academic environment. The results of those researches could ease decisions on the evaluation and development of science, that is, on planning a national science policy.
Keywords: natural sciences, Croatia, bibliometric analysis, scientific productivity, scientific impact, evaluation of scientific work, development of science, scientific policy
Conference Presentations by Natasa Jermen
Keywords: online encyclopaedia, knowledge networking, Semantic Web, scientific and professional infrastructure, Croatian technological heritage, Croatian Encyclopaedia of Technology
out in collaboration with all the relevant institutions and experts within the field. This paper reports on the objectives and methodology of the project. By describing historical development in addition to the current state of technology in Croatia, the main purpose of this open access Encyclopaedia is to comprehensively summarise the field's knowledge. Besides its contribution to understanding the role of technology in a social and cultural context, it will serve as a platform for
knowledge networking and sharing, thus facilitating research into the Croatian history of technology. Furthermore, this paper will discuss the innovative role of the Encyclopaedia. Due to the importance of the technological artefacts in research and education, the traditional textual encyclopaedic content will be upgraded using available digital data about the artefacts accessible to the public, thus creating a virtual museum of technology. To conclude, we will explain how networking
of information from various sources and encyclopaedically organised knowledge could contribute to the development of the history of technology, as well as to the revalorisation and the sustainability of the technology heritage.
Drafts by Natasa Jermen
Institute’s publicly available repository of encyclopaedic knowledge enables the linking to the digital data and collections of other research and cultural institutions; therefore the collaborative projects aimed at reinforcing digital research and cultural infrastructure will be described.
Thanks to the properties of the digital media and increasing connectivity, a closer collaboration between professionally edited online encyclopaedias across Europe (and beyond) is enabled. This paper elaborates a range of initiatives seeking to build connections across individual European and North American national encyclopaedias, focusing on the role that Croatian encyclopaedistics plays in this endeavour.
from 1991 to 2005 was determined by analysing 8436 papers published in natural science journals, indexed
in the Wos-SCI-Expanded database for the given period. Thus we were able to gain insights into
the characteristics of scientific communications from Croatian scientific institutions, for example, their
productivity and influence, for the period that preceded the implementation of the current system
of evaluating scientific performance and the creation of national strategic documents that were designed
to provide guidelines for the development of science. Also, it was determined whether the legal
framework of evaluating scientific institutions and the strategies for the development of science were
based on the true state of scientific activity in the field of natural sciences. This research is the starting
point for further systemic scientometric research which would enable the monitoring of the observed
conditions and trends in the activity of Croatian scientific institutions.
The purpose of this research was to establish the features of scientific activity in the field of natural sciences in Croatia, using a bibliometric analysis of 8436 scientific papers with a Croatian address published in natural sciences journals indexed in WoS-SCI database from 1991 to 2005.
The first part of the dissertation (chapters 1, 2 and 3) defines the role of bibliometrics and scientometrics as well as the review process in evaluating scientific performance. The role of a journal as the main communication channel in natural sciences is described, and an overview of the most important secondary sources of information for the field of natural sciences is presented. The creators of scientific information as well as scientific cooperation are described. Scientific productivity and scientific impact are defined, as well as the indicators that determine them. Basic guidelines of science policy in Croatia are commented on. Strategies of science and education development are described. The legal status of science and the systems of evaluation of scientific performance are defined.
Since previous means of the assessment of scientific performance have not proven satisfactory in Croatia, in the goals of the research (chapter 4) it is stated that the aim of the research was to point out the need to define a new model of evaluation and stimulation of scientific work in the field of natural sciences.
The methodology of the research is described in chapter 5. It is stated that the research sample consisted of the papers published in natural sciences journals indexed in the WoS from 1991 to 2005, on which at least one author had a Croatian institutional address and that data on the citation of those papers was also retrieved from the WoS. The journal status was determined using its IF from the JCR Science Edition database for 2005. Journals represented in the Current Contents database were analysed.
Chapter 6 shows the results of the research and the discussion. Data retrieved with the analysis of the scientific activity using two indicators, scientific productivity and its scientific impact is shown and interpreted. Scientific productivity is shown by the number of papers in the WoS-SCI database in the observed 15-year period, and the scientific impact of those papers was determined with the citation analysis. As additional indicators, trends in co-authorship as well as international cooperation were determined. Besides the position of
scientific activity in the field of natural sciences as a whole, characteristics of scientific activity were determined for specific fields of natural sciences: biology, physics, geosciences, chemistry, mathematics and interdisciplinary field. The most productive fields of natural sciences for the observed period were chemistry (33.9% of all papers), physics (27.3% of all papers) and biology (24.9% of all papers). The highest impact of papers was observed in the field of physics (on average 10.7 citations per paper) and geosciences (on average 8.1 citations per paper), and the lowest in the field of mathematics (on average 2.6 citations per paper). The scientific activity of Croatian institutions whose addresses were indicated on the papers in the examined body of natural sciences journals was also analysed. The Ruđer Bošković Institute, Faculty of Science in Zagreb and the Institute of Physics were shown to be the centres of excellence. When it came to universities, the University of Zagreb and the University of Rijeka stood out.
Chapter 7 comments on the existing system of the assessment of scientific performance and points out its shortcomings, since that system is not adapted to the specificities of various scientific disciplines. Based on the specificity of scientific publishing in certain fields of natural sciences determined by this research, some of the guidelines for possible changes in the existing system of evaluating scientific performance are offered. Specifically, it is pointed out that scientific output of different fields and subfields of natural sciences should not be compared. Furthermore, using determined conditions and trends in scientific activity, possible directions of natural sciences development are defined, based on which Croatia could become recognisable in the international scientific environment.
The conclusion (chapter 8) points out that the results of the research could help institutions and bodies responsible for creating science policy devise more objective tools for the assessment of scientific performance in the field of natural sciences and in planning the development of natural sciences. Systematic bibliometric and scientometric research could influence an improvement of the scientific status of Croatia in the academic environment. The results of those researches could ease decisions on the evaluation and development of science, that is, on planning a national science policy.
Keywords: natural sciences, Croatia, bibliometric analysis, scientific productivity, scientific impact, evaluation of scientific work, development of science, scientific policy
Keywords: online encyclopaedia, knowledge networking, Semantic Web, scientific and professional infrastructure, Croatian technological heritage, Croatian Encyclopaedia of Technology
out in collaboration with all the relevant institutions and experts within the field. This paper reports on the objectives and methodology of the project. By describing historical development in addition to the current state of technology in Croatia, the main purpose of this open access Encyclopaedia is to comprehensively summarise the field's knowledge. Besides its contribution to understanding the role of technology in a social and cultural context, it will serve as a platform for
knowledge networking and sharing, thus facilitating research into the Croatian history of technology. Furthermore, this paper will discuss the innovative role of the Encyclopaedia. Due to the importance of the technological artefacts in research and education, the traditional textual encyclopaedic content will be upgraded using available digital data about the artefacts accessible to the public, thus creating a virtual museum of technology. To conclude, we will explain how networking
of information from various sources and encyclopaedically organised knowledge could contribute to the development of the history of technology, as well as to the revalorisation and the sustainability of the technology heritage.