UHP

got this new strain called “transed gender” you’ll be zonked out of your mind

1h later: the CIS are lying to us. do you hear a bus coming closer

URGENT! FUNDS NEEDED TODAY TO SAVE A BABY

Ahmed Hammad, @life-111, is a Gazan (vetted by @90-ghost) whose baby is on a respirator and needs an operation tomorrow. He has to raise 800$ for the operation or they will take his baby off the respirator. HIS BABY WOULD DIE. YOU CAN AVOID THIS. PLEASE DM HIM FOR HIS PAYPAL, GOFUNDME WOUD TAKE TOO LONG. BE THE HERO HE NEEDS!

Keep reading

THE BABY NEEDS TREATMENT

IT'S VERY DANGEROUS AND THEY NEED MONEY URGENTLY


The treatment costs $1,980. IF 19 PEOPLE DONATED 100 DOLLARS IT WOULD BE ENOUGH. IF 38 PEOPLE DONATED 50 DOLLARS IT WOULD BE ENOUGH. PLEASE DM HIM FOR HIS PAYPAL!!!!

Keep reading

image

these are my favorite flowers, silver acacia. a symbol of international women's day in the USSR and one of the first plants to survive (and bloom again) after the bombing of hiroshima. also, they're a very nice yellow. :)

I think more shampoos and conditioners should have braille on them not only is it useful for me but like. okay if you don't want to get soap in your eyes you can feel around for it and know what you're touching. it's smart

Without looking it up:

  1. Who was Miguel Primo de Rivera?
  2. How many elections did the Second Spanish Republic hold?
  3. What specific event marked the surrender of the Republic in the Spanish Civil War?
  4. What year was the current Spanish constitution approved?
  5. What happened on the 23rd of February, 1981?

How many do you know?

0

1

2

3

4

5

A few weeks ago, Spanish social-democratic president Pedro Sánchez and his government gained some attention from NATO because of the apparent refusal to reach the 2% GDP military expenditure demanded for this summer, originally a goal for 2029. This is happening at the same time as the EU commission’s recommendation for households to get a 72 hour emergency survival kit, “in the case of war or some other crisis”, and more broadly, the reinstatement of partial drafts in Central-northern Europe and massive increases in military spending in the easternmost NATO members such as Poland.

So, in the face of the very explicit turn towards a war economy in Europe, it might seem like social-democrats such as Sánchez are a good enough ally against that militarization. However what has been less publicised than that initial opposition was the agreement to reach the 2% by the end of this year, and the statements Sánchez made in favor of a “Euroarmy”. He knows that standard remilitarization is still widely unpopular, so instead, he proposes to create an army for one of the largest imperialist organisms on Earth, the EU. All the while, the largest NATO naval exercise in years happened in Cádiz with the complete support of this supposedly pacifist government.

At the core of bourgeois pacifism is always a material support for the furthering of imperialism. They kept selling arms to Israel into 2024, they’re a wilful and eager support of the EU’s so called external borders and managers of one of the most militarized and deadly borders in the world, they hold NATO summits, they act as a vessel for the penetration of European capital in Latinamerica, they continue to permit the leasing of the bases in Rota and Morón to NATO, not to even mention all the key infrastructure held in Spain, such as the Combined Air Operations Center in Torrejón, which “is responsible for some of NATO’s special Air Policing arrangements, such as Air Policing over Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Slovenia.”

In the face of an imperialist rearmament, the only answer is the independent political organization of the working class, that is, breaking with the promises of social peace (that is, the complete control of the capitalist class) that the managers of capitalism seek in exchange for breadcrumbs and lies. A total and immediate withdrawal from NATO, the EU, and every other imperialist structure.

lepisosteus-oculatus:

clarifying question on the leftcom post, about one bit in the Lenin quote there: “and in case of need using even armed force against the exploiting classes and their states.”

does this imply that there are manifestations of revolution that are not involving armed force? specifying “case of need” for armed force indicates to me that there are also cases in which armed force may not be needed. isn’t the correct understanding of violent revolution that it is the thing that is necessary, because the ruling classes have no cause or reason to relinquish their power when “pressured” through non-violent means? what purpose does specifying “case of need” serve here? /genuine question, not a gotcha

Here, Lenin is referring to the course of action a socialist (post-revolution) state could take against bourgeois states:

After expropriating the capitalists and organising their own socialist production [i.e. after a successful, necessarily violent, revolution], the victorious proletariat of that country will arise against the rest of the world—the capitalist world—attracting to its cause the oppressed classes of other countries, stirring uprisings in those countries against the capitalists, and in case of need using even armed force against the exploiting classes and their states [in the case that it is necessary, military intervention by the socialist state to elevate the proletariat of that capitalist country to holding political and economic power].

That other case that Lenin implies is a situation in which the existing socialist states could “export” the revolution without needing direct military action, such as an invasion. He mentions one of those other possible courses of action beforehand: “stirring uprisings in those [capitalist] countries against the capitalists”. Certainly a violent action, in that it’s a revolution, but the socialist state in question that is sponsoring this other revolution is not using its own armed force like it would in an invasion.