Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Cdip150 (talk | contribs) at 14:16, 22 September 2010 (+). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale

{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>

<translate> Before making a request:</translate>

  1. <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
  2. <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
  3. <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
  4. <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>


<translate> How to make a request</translate>

<translate> How to make a request:</translate>

  • <translate> Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also [[<tvar name="Srcu">Template:Srcu/doc#Usage</tvar>|<tvar name="Srcu2">{{srcu}}</tvar> help]]).</translate>
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = <translate><!--T:11--> [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
     |reason          = <translate><!--T:12--> Reasons here</translate>. ~~~~
    }}
    

    <translate> For example:</translate>

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = <translate><!--T:14--> [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link --></translate>
     |reason          = <translate><!--T:15--> Reasons here.</translate> ~~~~
    }}
    
  • <translate> Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.</translate>
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Hoyojo@zh.wikipedia

Comment Comment For me it doesn't seems to be a valid reason , Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing Mardetanha talk 13:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nor for me. In fact I find contradictions in the rationale (i.e.: "I don't think they're sockpuppeting" - they why this request?). Additionally: opposing in a vote is not a valid reason to run a check unless you have strong suspicions of votestacking. Best regards, --dferg ☎ talk 15:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting for CU because Hoyojo is blocked with "sockpuppeting" reason. But in a vote, they have opposite vote. Are they sockpuppet?-Waihorace 12:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to the current discussions in zh.wikipedia (1 and 2), there are currently some suspected sockpuppets which are controlled by users who have been indefinitely blocked due to repeated vandalism.

The suspected users are follows:

And the suspected sockpuppets are follows:

As the behavior check may not be reliable due to some reason, we need more technical assistance in identifying the relationships of the suspected accounts. Hence, please help to check the relationship of these accounts. Thank you.--Altt311 14:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, one suspected sockpuppet vowes that he has other sockpuppets, so please also check if any other confirmed sockpuppets. Thank you very much!--Altt311 14:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Results

OK, I saw a ground now:

  •  Confirmed that Hoyojo = Twhk2011 = Wikipost.

--dferg ☎ talk 14:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Srimalpunchi@si.wikipedia

මීමා 03:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment To investigating Steward, I have reason to believe the petitioner themselves a sockpuppet of si:User:බිගුවා, and si:User:එළහරකා. If you demand I'll file a separate case. BTW the above discussion is for exactly to curb the unhelpful edits of this kind editors. Best--Chanaka L (talk) 07:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

::Chanaka L, If you want just make a request please. I don't want to be that much stupid. I have an account called mmnanuruddha(not using anymore). Other than that I'm clean. So go head. make a separate case. I can say 100% i'm not the si:User:එළහරකා neither මීමා. Also i'm beliving that will make your mind clean. I like that. -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 10:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry Chanaka L, Really sorry. you means බිගුවා & not me. my fault. I'll delete about comment. Yep. I Agee with you. -- බිඟුවා සාකච්ඡාව 10:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Abstain Home project. Kylu 11:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corvo55@it.wikinews

Please, advise me if there is a comment or something else, otherwise I won't know if there is a comment or the request is done. Thank you! --→ Airon Ĉ 13:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results

Stale:

  • Corvo Federico
  • Corvo Pietro Pio
  • Orbomichele

Unrelated Unrelated

  • Corvo55
  • Corvo Michele

--Shizhao 12:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hoyojo@zh.wikipedia

The suspected users are follows:

ArséniureDeGallium@fr.wiktionary

Not done. Demande refusée. L'outil de CheckUser ne doit pas être utilisé pour « aller à la pêche » s'il n'y a pas de soupçons spécifiques ou de vandalisme à grande échelle.
Cela dit, à titre personnel, je ne saurais que trop conseiller à la communauté de Wiktionary en français de ne pas entrer dans le jeu d'ArséniureDeGallium, qui a depuis longtemps démontré qu'il ne cherche qu'à amener autant de trouble que possible, ce que sa candidature actuelle indique explicitement (« ma principale motivation pour créer cette page de candidature est de prouproucatéper les admins de wp. »). guillom 20:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inhins@zh.wikipedia

See also