Trang Dang
Dr Trang Thi Doan Dang is a lecturer in the Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam. She is a Teaching Associate in the Faculty of Education, Monash University, where she obtained her PhD qualification. She is also an EAL teacher at Chisholm Institute - Australia. Her research interests are in the fields of English language pedagogy, Applied Linguistics, and teacher professional development.
Supervisors: A/Professor Janet Scull and Dr Raqib Chowdhury
Supervisors: A/Professor Janet Scull and Dr Raqib Chowdhury
less
Related Authors
Susan C Gasson
James Cook University
Montserrat Castello
Ramon Llull University
Minna Maunula
University of Jyväskylä
Amanda Manypeney
University of Melbourne
Magda Fourie-Malherbe
Stellenbosch University
Lilia Mantai
The University of Sydney
Theophilus Adedokun
Durban University of Technology
Uploads
Papers by Trang Dang
that appreciate PhD graduates’ agency
therefore remained largely underexplored, especially in the context of Vietnam. Theoretical concepts of behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement were used to analyze data from audio recordings of students’ interactions and their written responses to open-ended questions. The analysis of data showed that the eight groups engaged behaviorally, socially, and cognitively in the process, although their engagement varied according to the learning tasks, the teacher’s intervention, peer support, English ability, and types of gaps. Findings from the eight-week intervention suggest teachers should consider factors which determine student engagement with feedback-correction practices. By offering students opportunities to act on specific language issues in their writing through detecting and correcting gaps and rewriting the corrected texts, engagement with feedback-correction
practices can be useful in fostering accuracy development. This qualitative multiple-case study contributes new insights to the field by operationalizing the sequence of feedback-correction through collaborative learning to deeply understand students’ multidimensional engagement in the process from which implications for L2 writing and further research are discussed.
that appreciate PhD graduates’ agency
therefore remained largely underexplored, especially in the context of Vietnam. Theoretical concepts of behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement were used to analyze data from audio recordings of students’ interactions and their written responses to open-ended questions. The analysis of data showed that the eight groups engaged behaviorally, socially, and cognitively in the process, although their engagement varied according to the learning tasks, the teacher’s intervention, peer support, English ability, and types of gaps. Findings from the eight-week intervention suggest teachers should consider factors which determine student engagement with feedback-correction practices. By offering students opportunities to act on specific language issues in their writing through detecting and correcting gaps and rewriting the corrected texts, engagement with feedback-correction
practices can be useful in fostering accuracy development. This qualitative multiple-case study contributes new insights to the field by operationalizing the sequence of feedback-correction through collaborative learning to deeply understand students’ multidimensional engagement in the process from which implications for L2 writing and further research are discussed.
You can read the chapter online via the following link:
https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=QMB7DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA36&dq=EFL+learners%E2%80%99+roles+in+a+mediational+process+of+written+corrective+feedback:+Writing+accuracy+and+responses&ots=-vV7fI3phU&sig=cU9Zw06geedgnjuSPH7KZJOSF-A#v=onepage&q=EFL%20learners%E2%80%99%20roles%20in%20a%20mediational%20process%20of%20written%20corrective%20feedback%3A%20Writing%20accuracy%20and%20responses&f=false
Key words: Noticing; feedback; writing instruction
Key words
Collaborative feedback; noticing and scaffolding
Keywords: collaborative correction, problem-solving, scaffolding
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. http://rer.sagepub.com/content/77/1/81
Keywords: language pedagogy, socio-cultural perspective, reform
This study adopted an embedded quasi-experimental design by embedding classroom observations into the eight correcting sessions. Intact classes, each with 31 secondary students in Vietnam, were assigned a collaborative group (CG) and a teacher guided group (TGG). The intervention lasted 8 weeks, 120 minutes each, with 8 topics of correction. The observations looked into how mixed-ability groups mediate learning through their participation within and among groups in the CG. The Mann–Whiney U Tests on pre-/post-writing of the CG and the TGG indicated that both methods of correction positively influenced students’ writing performance. However, in a between-groups design, the CG outperformed the TGG in terms of production of letters and descriptions; U = 335, p = .040, r = -.26 and U = 340, p = .047, r = -.25. Additionally, initial analysis of note-taking and audio-recording from the observations exhibited three groups of learners: non-participant, supported participant, and active participant. An obvious consequence of this might result from the three factors: the correcting design, reciprocal involvement, and contextual aspects. I conclude that WCF may prove valuable for Vietnamese EFL learners when they are offered opportunities for participation in social exchanges during the correcting sequences.
Key words
Written corrective feedback; writing performance; mediated learning experience; teacher and peer feedback
The study adopted an embedded quasi-experimental design. Classroom observations were embedded into 8 correcting sessions of 120 minutes each. Intact classes, each with 31 secondary students, were assigned a collaborative group (CG) and a teacher guided group (TGG). The observations in the CG explored how mixed-ability groups participate in and among groups. Findings from the pre- and post-written tasks revealed that teacher- and group-correction strategies had positively influenced students’ writing performance. However, in a between-groups design, the Mann–Whiney U Tests indicated that the CG outperformed the TGG in two different types of written tasks. In a within-groups design, while the CG significantly improved on two written tasks, only improvement in one type of task was found in the TGG. Thematic analysis of the observations exhibited three groups of learners: non/selective-participant, supported-participant, and active-participant, which might result from three factors: the correcting design, reciprocal involvement, and contextual aspects. This study offers recommendations for providing students with social exchanges during the correcting sequences and incorporating WCF into English writing instruction in the local curriculum in Vietnam.
Key words
Written corrective feedback; writing improvement; mediated learning experience; student engagement