Rita Padawangi
Related Authors
Noel B. Salazar
KU Leuven
Nikos Passas
Northeastern University
Naim Kapucu
University of Central Florida
Teresa Marat-Mendes
ISCTE - University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL)
Benjamin Isakhan
Deakin University
Bob Jessop
Lancaster University
Richard Bellamy
University College London
Martin van Bruinessen
Universiteit Utrecht
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
InterestsView All (25)
Uploads
Papers by Rita Padawangi
(By Kashif Shaad, Yazid Ninsalam, Rita Padawangi, Paolo Burlando)
population, dynamic local economies, organic policy making processes, and scarcity and consistency of data challenge research on flood impacts and possible solutions in Asian cities. Resultantly, a deeper understanding of alternative
and more dynamic forms of environmental management is necessary. The focus of this paper is to analyze the usefulness and challenges of participatory mapping in relation to urban floods, particularly community mapping and crowdsourced
mapping. This analysis is based on the assumption of participatory mapping discourse that participatory mapping increases communities’ negotiation power to improve their livelihood. This paper employs participant observation
and ethnographic interviews within the Ciliwung River corridor in Jakarta. Specifically it focuses on activists and residents in river communities in relation to participatory community mapping exercises conducted since 2012 and a new
crowd-sourced flood mapping system launched in December 2014. Participatory community mapping and crowd-sourced flood mapping, as two forms of community-based mapping approaches to floods, are viewed as potential tools to
overcome urban flood hazards while raising disaster awareness among city residents. Community mapping is a method of visualizing a neighborhood's communal memories and embedded power relations, while a crowd-sourced flood
map visualizes vulnerabilities and may become a tool for information sharing for the betterment of the spatially and socially fragmented city.
Given the inequality within power relations in the city and within localities, this chapter features Jakarta and Singapore to integrate theoretical and empirical insights to understand how, when, and why urban residents can potentially construct their own spaces and reframe the built environment in their own counter-hegemonic ways. Both cities have different urban governance regimes and state-society relations, but similarly experiencing ever-expanding corporatization of space that pressurizes the public city and insurgent urbanism. The analysis highlights that counter-hegemonic spaces of hope is more than calling residents to build their own neighborhood spaces, but also involves breaking down the elitism of the design profession to be accessible by residents.
and mobilisations to include rebuilding a public city with long-term social impacts. Three themes that emerged in the midst of new media proliferation and Asia’s rapid urbanisation include (1) corporatisation of urban space, (2) social media and the city and (3) insurgencies and the public city. Along these three themes, this Special Issue proposes three main issues for a research agenda aimed at analysing urban insurgencies: (1) the relationship between the power of digital media in insurgent mobilisation and the physical spaces of the city, (2) the materialisation of resistance movements in cyberspace and on the ground in the form of an authentic public city and (3) recognition of modest forms of change as results of everyday insurgencies.
(By Kashif Shaad, Yazid Ninsalam, Rita Padawangi, Paolo Burlando)
population, dynamic local economies, organic policy making processes, and scarcity and consistency of data challenge research on flood impacts and possible solutions in Asian cities. Resultantly, a deeper understanding of alternative
and more dynamic forms of environmental management is necessary. The focus of this paper is to analyze the usefulness and challenges of participatory mapping in relation to urban floods, particularly community mapping and crowdsourced
mapping. This analysis is based on the assumption of participatory mapping discourse that participatory mapping increases communities’ negotiation power to improve their livelihood. This paper employs participant observation
and ethnographic interviews within the Ciliwung River corridor in Jakarta. Specifically it focuses on activists and residents in river communities in relation to participatory community mapping exercises conducted since 2012 and a new
crowd-sourced flood mapping system launched in December 2014. Participatory community mapping and crowd-sourced flood mapping, as two forms of community-based mapping approaches to floods, are viewed as potential tools to
overcome urban flood hazards while raising disaster awareness among city residents. Community mapping is a method of visualizing a neighborhood's communal memories and embedded power relations, while a crowd-sourced flood
map visualizes vulnerabilities and may become a tool for information sharing for the betterment of the spatially and socially fragmented city.
Given the inequality within power relations in the city and within localities, this chapter features Jakarta and Singapore to integrate theoretical and empirical insights to understand how, when, and why urban residents can potentially construct their own spaces and reframe the built environment in their own counter-hegemonic ways. Both cities have different urban governance regimes and state-society relations, but similarly experiencing ever-expanding corporatization of space that pressurizes the public city and insurgent urbanism. The analysis highlights that counter-hegemonic spaces of hope is more than calling residents to build their own neighborhood spaces, but also involves breaking down the elitism of the design profession to be accessible by residents.
and mobilisations to include rebuilding a public city with long-term social impacts. Three themes that emerged in the midst of new media proliferation and Asia’s rapid urbanisation include (1) corporatisation of urban space, (2) social media and the city and (3) insurgencies and the public city. Along these three themes, this Special Issue proposes three main issues for a research agenda aimed at analysing urban insurgencies: (1) the relationship between the power of digital media in insurgent mobilisation and the physical spaces of the city, (2) the materialisation of resistance movements in cyberspace and on the ground in the form of an authentic public city and (3) recognition of modest forms of change as results of everyday insurgencies.