Chris Knoester
Traditionally, my research has focused on the effects of children on parents’ lives and on the patterns and implications of fathering, specifically. Recently, I have been comprehensively analyzing the patterns and implications of paternity leaves. I created a new National Sports and Society Survey (https://nsass.org), a landmark project that focuses on patterns of sports involvement and their links to well-being, and have been actively researching sports and society issues for some time, now.
less
Related Authors
Ellen I . Graves
University of Virginia
jaime schultz
Penn State University
CJ Jones
Santa Clara University
Rachel Allison
Mississippi State University
Uploads
Papers by Chris Knoester
(N = 3,993), this study described and analyzed U.S. adults’
reports of their youth sports experiences. We considered
patterns in ever having played a sport regularly while growing
up, ever having played an organized sport, and then
relative likelihoods of having never played an organized
sport, played and dropped out of organized sports, or played
an organized sport continually while growing up. We used
binary and multinomial logistic regressions to assess the
relevance of generational, gender, racial/ethnic, socioeconomic
status, and family and community sport culture contexts
for youth sports participation experiences. Overall, the
findings highlight general increases in ever playing organized
sports and ever playing organized sports and dropping
out across generations. Increasing levels of female sports
participation, emerging disparities by socioeconomic statuses,
and the continual salience of family and community
cultures of sport for participation are also striking.
sample of U.S. adults (N¼1,461), this study considers the
extent to which social structure and culture worked together
to activate affinities for Donald Trump. For our analyses, we
used multiple regressions and first focused on the extent to
which social structural locations (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity,
age, education, rurality) were associated with a willingness to
trust Trump and report intentions to vote for him. Then, we
considered partisanship affiliations. Finally, we looked at the
extent to which hegemonically masculine, racial/ethnic and
nativist, and authorities on truth values helped to further
establish affinities for Trump. Findings indeed revealed that
cultural value contestations were central to establishing affinities
for Trump. Such beliefs even remained linked to intentions
to vote for Trump after accounting for adults’ trust
in him.
(N = 3,993), this study described and analyzed U.S. adults’
reports of their youth sports experiences. We considered
patterns in ever having played a sport regularly while growing
up, ever having played an organized sport, and then
relative likelihoods of having never played an organized
sport, played and dropped out of organized sports, or played
an organized sport continually while growing up. We used
binary and multinomial logistic regressions to assess the
relevance of generational, gender, racial/ethnic, socioeconomic
status, and family and community sport culture contexts
for youth sports participation experiences. Overall, the
findings highlight general increases in ever playing organized
sports and ever playing organized sports and dropping
out across generations. Increasing levels of female sports
participation, emerging disparities by socioeconomic statuses,
and the continual salience of family and community
cultures of sport for participation are also striking.
sample of U.S. adults (N¼1,461), this study considers the
extent to which social structure and culture worked together
to activate affinities for Donald Trump. For our analyses, we
used multiple regressions and first focused on the extent to
which social structural locations (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity,
age, education, rurality) were associated with a willingness to
trust Trump and report intentions to vote for him. Then, we
considered partisanship affiliations. Finally, we looked at the
extent to which hegemonically masculine, racial/ethnic and
nativist, and authorities on truth values helped to further
establish affinities for Trump. Findings indeed revealed that
cultural value contestations were central to establishing affinities
for Trump. Such beliefs even remained linked to intentions
to vote for Trump after accounting for adults’ trust
in him.