Kishan Khoday
United Nations Development Programme, UNDP Global Policy Network, Regional Team Leader - Nature, Climate and Energy
Kishan has been with the United Nations for over 20 years, having led local cooperation on sustainable development through assignments with UN offices in China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.
less
InterestsView All (9)
Uploads
Papers by Kishan Khoday
One of the oldest life forms on Earth, viruses have been a key component of the world’s ecosystems for hundreds of millions of years and have played an important role in the evolution of the planet’s ecosystems. They constitute one of the most abundant life forms on the planet, with this vast unseen component of the world’s ecosystems – the virosphere – influencing climatic and geochemical cycles and having co-evolved with other species, including humanity. Far from a ‘black swan’ event, today’s COVID-19 outbreak had been long predicted. The global pandemic is a clear warning sign of the implications of breaching planetary boundaries, with more than 75% of new diseases in recent decades being zoonotic spread between animals and humans. But as devastating as the current crisis has been and continues to be, such outbreaks are likely to continue and even escalate on the road to 2030 and beyond, unless development pathways and our relationship with nature are remade.
Climate change and ecological fragility call into question the assumption that human progress will make the future look better than the past. Recent years have witnessed record carbon emissions, accelerating levels of biological extinction, and the growing frequency of disasters and outbreaks of disease. As ecological and social fabrics are destabilized, so are basic principles of human development theory such as capability, agency and freedom. What happens to the concept of human agency when humanity has revealed itself as an agent of planetary change? How can the concept of ‘development as freedom’ evolve into ‘sustainable development as freedom’ as ecological change causes mass disruption, and as sensibilities about freedom and rights transform? How can development pathways shift from linear to systems approaches to better grasp the complexities of planetary transformation?
Ecological change is destabilizing the status quo of development theory, exposing deep contradictions in policy and practice. The 2030 Agenda reflects an aspiration to bring together the social and natural foundations of development policy. Achieving this goal will require more than scaled-up finance and green technology. Transformational change will demand adaptation of the concept of human development itself.
One of the oldest life forms on Earth, viruses have been a key component of the world’s ecosystems for hundreds of millions of years and have played an important role in the evolution of the planet’s ecosystems. They constitute one of the most abundant life forms on the planet, with this vast unseen component of the world’s ecosystems – the virosphere – influencing climatic and geochemical cycles and having co-evolved with other species, including humanity. Far from a ‘black swan’ event, today’s COVID-19 outbreak had been long predicted. The global pandemic is a clear warning sign of the implications of breaching planetary boundaries, with more than 75% of new diseases in recent decades being zoonotic spread between animals and humans. But as devastating as the current crisis has been and continues to be, such outbreaks are likely to continue and even escalate on the road to 2030 and beyond, unless development pathways and our relationship with nature are remade.
Climate change and ecological fragility call into question the assumption that human progress will make the future look better than the past. Recent years have witnessed record carbon emissions, accelerating levels of biological extinction, and the growing frequency of disasters and outbreaks of disease. As ecological and social fabrics are destabilized, so are basic principles of human development theory such as capability, agency and freedom. What happens to the concept of human agency when humanity has revealed itself as an agent of planetary change? How can the concept of ‘development as freedom’ evolve into ‘sustainable development as freedom’ as ecological change causes mass disruption, and as sensibilities about freedom and rights transform? How can development pathways shift from linear to systems approaches to better grasp the complexities of planetary transformation?
Ecological change is destabilizing the status quo of development theory, exposing deep contradictions in policy and practice. The 2030 Agenda reflects an aspiration to bring together the social and natural foundations of development policy. Achieving this goal will require more than scaled-up finance and green technology. Transformational change will demand adaptation of the concept of human development itself.
This chapter argues that international climate law has not only been ineffective but has in some ways made things worse. Climate change demands more than the proliferation of new legal specializations and expertise. Rather, it fundamentally unravels the foundations of our discipline, revealing mistaken disciplinary assumptions about development, progress, and order. The implications of climate change transcend international law, challenging knowledge production in the social sciences more generally. Disciplines that are built on the assumption that natural systems are stable – such as law, economics, political science, and so on – no longer function when natural systems are destabilized. An adequate disciplinary response requires, first, understanding how international law contributed to this instability; and second, reshaping the fundamental building blocks of international law – concepts such as sovereignty, jurisdiction, territory, development, human rights, and so on – in a more sustainable vein. Climate change and the other types of environmental degradation multiplying today evidence that ecology gives birth to law, rather than the other way around. Revelatory of our longstanding disciplinary hubris, climate change is not only the product of our inability as lawyers to understand or govern nature, but it also shows us that it has always been the other way around: it is nature that creates and sustains us.