It should be possible to thank for resolving/unresolving a StructuredDiscussions topic.
e.g. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Redirect/logid/15077827
flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic should be thankable.
It should be possible to thank for resolving/unresolving a StructuredDiscussions topic.
e.g. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Redirect/logid/15077827
flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic should be thankable.
Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Allow thanking for flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic | mediawiki/extensions/Thanks | master | +2 -1 |
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open | None | T52867 Add a way to thank page patrollers for reviewing a page I created | |||
Open | None | T125653 Create new types of notifications | |||
Resolved | Niharika | T60485 [Epic] Allow thanks of log entry | |||
Resolved | Niharika | T191482 Add thanks for resolving StructuredDiscussions topics? |
I'm somewhat hesitant to whitelist such a generic term, especially since it's close to block.
But for this specific use — yeah, should probably be thankable.
We'll want to figure out a method to address requests for other less common logs — individual tickets or should we make a single large tracking ticket?
Yeah, it does seem a strange choice for a log type name, but it looks like it's not used for anything other than flow-* actions: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/26144
@TBolliger To clarify further, lock here is a type of log. It's not a regex or anything. Being similar to block doesn't affect anything.
I agree that flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic should be thankable.
We should let people file tickets if they want other log types to be thankable.
👍>>! In T191482#4110571, @Niharika wrote:
@TBolliger To clarify further, lock here is a type of log. It's not a regex or anything. Being similar to block doesn't affect anything.
I agree that flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic should be thankable.
We should let people file tickets if they want other log types to be thankable.
Change 425209 had a related patch set uploaded (by Niharika29; owner: Niharika29):
[mediawiki/extensions/Thanks@master] Allow thanking for flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic
Change 425209 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/Thanks@master] Allow thanking for flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic
I am sorry, but I think that the community does not know about the possibility to thank for flow-lock-topic and flow-restore-topic. And I think that the reasoning "I want to thank Foo for resolving this topic... No 'thank link' is displayed in the topic... No 'thank link' is displayed in the topic's history... I have to search for a 'thank link' in the public logs..." is too long (and complicated) for the contributors.
So I think that the 'thank link' should be displayed in the topic's history.