Pistons&Gears Inc

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
pallettown
pallettown

genuinely so scary that you can't access the page on the ssc website that guides you through changing your sex designation. so so fucking scary. they are already making our lives harder. they are already taking what little resources we have.

pallettown

update on this, if people want to reblog this to spread information to any trans person who is getting their gender marker changed with social security after the executive order:

today i went and was able to change my gender marker along with my name with social security. even though the page that guides you has been taken down you are STILL ABLE to do so. here is a link to the way back machine for the page and here is a link to the form you will need and here is another source that can help you prepare for federal crackdowns

don't be deterred by the removal of the page. there is still time, but possibly not a lot of it. if you can do this fast, do it.

it's worth noting that it's FREE to change your gender marker with social security. when you change your gender marker with social security, what you change it to does NOT have to match your other current IDs.

double check your state policies, and what you will personally need, but the overall message of this post is that there is STILL TIME despite the executive order. don't give up hope.

engineer-gunzelpunk
starlightshadowsworld

Calling all Brits on this hellsite.

We all saw Elon Musk do the nazi salute at the Trump inauguration. We know that he is influencing and fanning the flames of right wing political parties.

And that very well may include ours.

Because Elon Musk has pledged to donate $100 million to the Reform party. He has since mentioned that it might be hard to give such a large sum now.

But I don’t think we should take our chances. And I think we can agree that letting billionaires influence our countries politics is a terrible idea.

If you also agree here’s a link to a Parliament petition.

It calls for the government to remove loopholes that allow wealthy foreign individuals to make donations into UK political parties (e.g. by funnelling through UK registered companies).

As it is a parliament petition the government are required to debate it in parliament. But for that to happen it needs to reach 100,000 signatures.

Non British folk I’m afraid you guys can’t sign but I encourage you guys to reblog so that more people can see this.

transit-fag
transit-fag

Part 1/6

Would you fuck an elf

Yes

Yes for $20

No

See Results
transit-fag

Part 2/6

Would you fuck a dwarf

Yes

Yes for $20

No

See Results
transit-fag

Part 3/6

Would you fuck an Orc

Yes

Yes for $20

No

See Results
transit-fag

Part 4/6

Would you fuck a Faerie

Yes

Yes for $20

No

See Results
transit-fag

Part 5/6

Would you fuck a Dragon

Yes

Yes for $20

No

See Results
transit-fag

Part 6/7

Would you fuck a Centaur

Yes

Yes for $20

No

See Results
pistonsandgearsinc

Dude, 20 bucks, is 20 bucks.

Would.
sudriantraveler
interstellar-superdrive

Britt Allcroft, creator of the Thomas and Friends TV show, has passed away. It's the beginning of the year and there's already a celebrity death. She brought joy to millions worldwide through Thomas, and transformed the little tank engine into the global icon that he is today. May she rest in peace.

Thank you, Britt.

Britt with a panavision cameraALT
sudriantraveler

She brought Thomas the Tank Engine and all his friends to myself and so many other people. I know my life is so much better and brighter because of her work, and I'll always be thankful for that.

Thank you, Britt.

Goodbye, and Rest in Peace.

image
Rest In Peace Allcroft. 1943 - 2025
transit-fag
depsidase

image
transit-fag

They should be learning via trains and maps of train systems, but no, we must worship the almighty burger or whatever

transit-fag

A train could teach you so much, punctuality, efficiency, shapes, colors, words, ennui, hope, geography, electrical engineering and more

haretic-smith

What could a train teach me about hope and ennui, o wise transit fag?

transit-fag

Have you ever had to wait for a train at 2 am

pistonsandgearsinc

I have!

whumpster-fire
whumpster-fire

Dumb RWS Headcanons: How Do the Faces Work?

I know it's kind of silly but I really like the idea that the engines' faces are actual physical objects.

  • Vehicles' faceplates are in theory a single piece of metal other than the eyelids, but it changes shape and moves.
  • Faceplates are manufactured as "blanks" with nondescript features. The first time an engine is steamed or otherwise activated and able to move under its own power, their face warps itself into shape. Within a class there's usually some family resemblance, but no one truly knows what an engine will look like until they're fired up! Twins sometimes happen when two or more engines are built at the same time and place, but identical twins are a small minority of engines, especially steam engines! They're more common the more standardized and mass-produced a vehicle is. Maybe 10% of steam engines and 20-30% of older diesels and electrics are twins/triplets - but this number has risen as multiple units and trainsets become more common. Sometimes engines call themselves twins even if they're not identical - Tallyln and Dolgoch's faces might not be the same as their Sudrian counterparts!
  • The face is not the center of an engine's sentience, as evidenced by the fact that some engines get on just fine without them! Why do people bother putting faces on them, then?... Honestly it's tradition. Modern people might be more comfortable having a conversation with a machine, but steam locomotives were invented not only over a century before computer-synthesized voices but several decades before the phonograph! Victorian-era British people were not comfortable entrusting their lives to an expressionless machine capable of speech and malice unless they could make eye contact with it.
  • The reason engines' faces are usually pale grey is because they're made of metals like white bronze, white brass, cupronickel, or nickel silver (note: this is a copper/nickel/zinc alloy and does not contain silver). These alloys are highly corrosion-resistant. Steam engines' smokeboxes are usually painted black because black paints are cheap, IIRC at the time were the only thing heat-resistant enough, and also coal dust and soot are less obvious on it. But the movement of an engine's face will cause paint to flake off very quickly. Theoretically making an engine's face out of colored metals or polishing it to be super shiny is possible but it's not done much, at least in the anglosphere. Some diesel and electric engines have faceplates made of anodized aluminum, (which lets them be the color of the surrounding bodywork), or stainless steel
  • Yes, you can remove and replace an engine's face! Usually this doesn't need to be done unless they're in a severe crash: steam engines' faces are made of thick metal and are supernaturally strong and ductile, and very corrosion-resistant, and will be just about the last thing to go if an engine is left to rust. If it is replaced, usually a blank won't warp to the right shape until the engine's fired, so the one time faceplates are specially sculpted for a specific engine is with preserved engines whose boilers can't be fired any time soon.
  • You shouldn't put an engine's face on a different engine. It will end up looking like the engine "wearing" it is supposed to look, but it's painful and results in the face developing cracks prematurely.
  • Also don't mess with the face of a scrapped engine. Don't use it on another engine, don't mount it on a wall or put it in a museum, just don't. Just lay it to rest by melting it down. You don't have the luxury of "not being superstitious" with the remains of a being that demonstrably had no physical means of speaking, moving, or changing its facial expressions. Human ghosts may be scary but relatively harmless specters of mist, wind, and whispers: the ghost of a machine is a poltergeist with the same power over fire, metal, electricity, inertia, and building-leveling amounts of pressurized steam that it did in life, but no longer limited to influencing its own body. The vengeful spirit of a departed steam engine doesn't rattle doorknobs or knock vases off tables, it causes unexplained gas leaks, failed pilot lights, broken chains or cables or hydraulic jacks, glitched carbon monoxide detectors, and water heaters or boilers that won't shut off and the emergency relief valves inexplicably jam.
  • Usually faces for non-powered rolling stock are made of carved wood or are painted on. Putting metal faces on them is mostly a Sodor thing, and possibly the GWR.
  • I'm not sure what engines' eyes are made of... maybe glass, or maybe they're hollow metal spheres? Either way the pupil is actually transparent and the inside surface of the eye is black. Faceless vehicles can see without eyes moderately well, but ones built with faces aren't used to it and can't see at all or very little if their eyes are covered or removed. Some engines' eyes light up (if an IRL engine's headlight is on the front of the smokebox, it probably has glowing eyes).
  • There isn't any mechanical device that moves an engine's eyes, but they do have physical support. They're kind of like a trackball computer mouse. They need to be lubricated and kept clean, and there is a real system for this. Some engines use condensed steam (usually coming from the source of steam for other accessories) or other water-based liquid for tears, but some might use mineral oil?
  • By the way these eyes can be big! Some of the largest American engines have eyeballs well over 2 feet in diameter!
  • Yes, the face swings open to access the smokebox/grille. The face itself may be on the smokebox door or be in front of it and on a separate hinge. The catch for the faceplate hinge is typically on the side of the smokebox. And then there are the Cab-Forwards and Garratts.
pistonsandgearsinc

Love how this implies someone actually brought a face home with them as a souvenir, only to get the spook of a lifetime. Fuck around and find out, I guess.

palant1r
autistichalsin

Some of you are literally watching the right wing continuously try to expand the definition of "pedophilia" to include "existing around a child while queer," and then agreeing with them when they say pedophiles deserve to be summarily executed.

Not only does this place innocent people in danger of political executions, it also puts children in danger, as most children who are sexually abused have this done by someone close to them, and feelings that they would be responsible for the death of their abuser if they reported leads to lower rates of reporting. It also leads to higher rates of abusers murdering their victims when they're found out because the punishment will be the same anyway.

Part of being on the left is realizing that it's better to let 100 guilty men go free than to wrongly convict one. Another part of being on the left is realizing that one's life is never something others have the right to take away- even the most evil people alive. Yes, that includes mass murderers and rapists and pedophiles. Once you make one group acceptable to kill, you give others a vested interest in defining groups they have prejudice against into that group.

You have to start dealing with the fact that no crime makes one's life forfeit. Not even the worst most depraved and sadistic acts. The worst people alive have rights, and if you can't accept that they deserve them, at least try to accept that it is to your benefit that they retain rights no matter what they're accused of. And if you can't do even that, well... you just might be the kind of person who would cut off your nose to spite your face.

If you want to protect victims, if you want to protect minority groups, you have to realize that sex crimes, or any crimes at all, do not deserve the death penalty. Period.

brettdoesdiscourse

When a certain kind of person "deserves" to die, bigots will make sure marginalized groups all are that kind of person.

tazmanian-cigarette

"The problem with speaking out against oppression is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels, for it against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning of it is to be stopped at all."

Once you have the idea enshrined in law that it is possible to commit an action that means you no longer have rights, the next group in power can expand upon the list of actions that cause someone to forfeit their rights.

A society that said murderers and child molesters have sacrificed the right to life, food, water, healthcare, etc may one day be ruled by people who feel that queerness, catholicism, or disagreeing with the government are crimes of an equal severity; and that just as murderers and rapists have sacrificed their basic rights, so too then have members LGBTQ community, or Christians, or people who like the color red, or literally any group the ruling class finds it politically advantageous to dehumanize that day.

Because the laws that say if someone does something "wrong enough" they no longer "deserve" to have rights already exist. And now it's up to that same government and that same society that passed those laws to decide what "wrong enough" to "deserve punishment" means.

This is why everyone has to have rights. The public needs to be protected from criminals. Criminals need to be prevented from committing crimes. "Punishing" someone for doing something "wrong" because "they deserve it" has absolutely no place in an organized government legal system and thus should never be invoked as a reason to support a law. "Prosecuting" someone for doing something "illegal" because "it is necessary to restrict the harm that people can do in order to create the best society possible for everyone who lives in it and keep the proverbial trains running on time" arguably does. I say arguably because I'm not generally a fan of laws and government, overall.

But I do think we should all be operating from the perspective of understanding that you don't (shouldn't) pass laws against things because they're "wrong." You pass laws against things because they're *harmful. You don't prosecute law breakers because they "deserve to be punished." You prosecute law breakers to prevent them from doing further harm. And if you, as a government, are incapable of preventing someone from doing further harm without executing them, you have no place in a civil society. It's short sighted, it's reactionary, it's unimaginative, it's dangerous, it's malicious, and it's unnecessary. Further, if it was actually true - which it functionally is not - it would be symptomatic of woeful incompetence and mismanagement.

We can put a man on the moon, we can annihilate cities on the opposite side of the world, we can build a society on a foundation of machinery that runs off the ancient liquefied muck left over from everything that's ever died, but we can't keep dangerous or amoral people ethically incarcerated without resorting to execution? Preposterous.

If they are a human homo sapiens anthropomorphic primate person of our species, they are not capable of doing anything to forfeit their human rights. Human rights are unconditional. It doesn't matter what they've done. Humans have human rights.

I can see the existence of scenarios where it might be necessary for one or more people to kill one or more other people as a necessary act of self defense, or self preservation.

But I don't think State Sanctioned Executions have ever been an example of that.

pistonsandgearsinc

#Preach

whumpster-fire
myfootyrthroat

I'm sorry, but I'm just too fucking old to pretend that the presidential ticket of "Person who performed some of the first gay marriages in her state while it was still federally illegal" and "governor who created a trans refuge state while other states were making it illegal to transition" is somehow 'jUsT aS bAd foR QuEer pEopLe' as the ticket promising to reverse marriage equality and make trans healthcare next to impossible.

That is such a monumentally stupid opinion that I'm going to have a hard time believing that you're actually that stupid, and I'll probably just assume you're malicious.

myfootyrthroat

Especially sick of hearing this from really young people. Like, sorry girl, the reason you could get HRT at 16 in this state is because one party is significantly better than the other.

image
gmbeowulf

For the record: Some of them (some of the LOUDEST of them) are actively and deliberately malicious. They're Russian psyops and Iranian propaganda shills and right-wing trolls who understand that anything that depresses the youth vote and minority vote makes it more likely for Trump to win. Are some of the comments "useful idiots"? Sure, but at this point anyone you see loudly trumpeting that "both sides are the same", especially if they claim to be queer (and/or some combination of other minorities) should be assumed to be a liar and a bad actor.

You cannot find an issue that Trump is not significantly worse on than Harris. Gaza? Harris wants peace talks, Trump wants to nuke Palestine. Climate? Harris wants to move toward carbon neutrality, Trump wants to remove all restrictions ever. Trans people? Harris is imperfectly supportive, Trump wants them all forcibly detransitioned, jailed and/or dead.

The choice is absolutely obvious, and if you don't vote for Harris you get Trump. And that's why there's so much effort to convince you not to vote.

discourse 2024 US Presidential Election